PDA

View Full Version : Wright Medical receives FDA clearance for Conserve Plus


Anonymous
11-24-2009, 10:53 AM
Wright Medical Group, Inc. Receives FDA Approval to Market CONSERVE(R) Plus Total Hip Resurfacing System
ARLINGTON, Tenn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 9, 2009-- Wright Medical Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: WMGI), a global orthopaedic medical device company, announced today that the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has given approval to the Company to market its original CONSERVE® Plus Total Hip Resurfacing System. Now available in the United States, this innovative total surface arthroplasty system provides surgeons and their patients a bone-conserving alternative to traditional total hip replacement.

The approval permits Wright to market CONSERVE® Plus in the original femoral and acetabular component configuration specified in its PreMarket Approval (PMA) application and enables the Company to initiate efforts to introduce additional enhancements to the system which are currently only available outside of the United States. The Company intends to incorporate these innovative future product options into the CONSERVE® Plus System’s femoral and acetabular component offerings via the PMA Supplement pathway.

Hip resurfacing may be ideal for young, active patients in need of surgical treatment for chronic pain. The CONSERVE® Plus system is designed to offer pain relief and restoration of function while retaining as much healthy bone as possible and preserving future surgery options, including a primary total hip replacement.

The approval follows a successful clinical trial involving more than 1,300 patients, including those enrolled under Continued Access protocols, providing patient data of CONSERVE® Plus clinical data in postoperative periods of up to eight years in length. Wright will commence surgeon training in the first phase of its U.S. introduction. The training is expected to begin immediately upon approval.

“Hip resurfacing represents a valuable alternative to younger, more active patients who desire a hip reconstruction that more anatomically mimics the natural hip,” commented Patrick Fisher, Sr. Director of Marketing for Wright’s hip franchise. “We have learned that this is an excellent option for patients who meet the criteria for hip resurfacing, and these individuals tend to be very enthusiastic and outspoken about their positive results.”

Anonymous
11-24-2009, 03:11 PM
Yeah! 3rd in line at the resurf trough. At least you have BFH bailout that noone else does.

Anonymous
11-25-2009, 01:24 AM
This is just another implant to place in Wright's growing hip bag. Wright was first with modular necks and now everyone else is catching up(Just ask and Stryker or Smith and Nephew rep who was bashing it and now has one coming). I think that the interest in resurfacing has peeked but it is nice to have a great system. Wright MEdical continues to show they are dedicated to becoming one of the big boys in the joint arena.

Anonymous
11-30-2009, 10:10 AM
This is just another implant to place in Wright's growing hip bag. Wright was first with modular necks and now everyone else is catching up(Just ask and Stryker or Smith and Nephew rep who was bashing it and now has one coming). I think that the interest in resurfacing has peeked but it is nice to have a great system. Wright MEdical continues to show they are dedicated to becoming one of the big boys in the joint arena.


That's pretty funny. What's Wright's market share in THR and TKR? One of the big boyz? PULEEEEZ.

Oh, and what does the literature show for the Conserve Plus? Bad product for a market space that has seen the high tide. Nice.

Anonymous
12-12-2009, 01:52 AM
That's pretty funny. What's Wright's market share in THR and TKR? One of the big boyz? PULEEEEZ.

Oh, and what does the literature show for the Conserve Plus? Bad product for a market space that has seen the high tide. Nice.

He said 'Dedicated on becoming' not 'Is' --- Must still be a cover rep --- Puleeeze!

Anonymous
12-13-2009, 06:12 PM
Do you really think Obama is going to pay for modular necks? Wright has come a long way from making tits, but they will never be a major player.

Anonymous
12-13-2009, 10:20 PM
your an idiot

Anonymous
12-14-2009, 07:49 AM
So I guess Zimmer, Stryker, and Smith and Nephew wasted a lot of money copying Wright's Modular hip system. I guess you don't know how pricing agreements work if you think that Wright's hip pricing will be an issue.

Anonymous
12-14-2009, 06:06 PM
So I guess Zimmer, Stryker, and Smith and Nephew wasted a lot of money copying Wright's Modular hip system. I guess you don't know how pricing agreements work if you think that Wright's hip pricing will be an issue.

You left out Biomet. I know how return on investment works while there is a future period of diminishing returns. I'm in the same boat, don't get me wrong, its just that modular necks ain't gonna get you to the top tier of this biz. I work with a huge 2 inc./Direct Anterior hip doc. We use the same 3 kinectiv necks everytime-even with varus rhuemetoids. The modularity is nice to have available, but not necessary and definitely more of a crutch.

Anonymous
12-14-2009, 08:58 PM
The necks are a way to fine tune the hip and get a more acurate center of rotation. People have had good success rates with out them just like they did before they had navigation the latest and greatest poly, new ergonomic instruments, etc. We typically use the same necks as well. But for the few times we needed the other necks they were nice. There are a lot of things that aren't considered a necesity but do make the case go smoother and do have the potential for better outcomes for patients.

Anonymous
12-29-2009, 10:33 PM
At the recent Current Concepts meeting, the metal on metal articulations were really being slammed. The data is starting to come out suggesting growing problems with pseudo-tunors and other biologic reactions. A number of big cutters at that meeting said they are moving away from MOM.

Anonymous
03-16-2010, 01:10 PM
That's pretty funny. What's Wright's market share in THR and TKR? One of the big boyz? PULEEEEZ.

Oh, and what does the literature show for the Conserve Plus? Bad product for a market space that has seen the high tide. Nice.

Your statement proves how incompetent you are in the area of resurfacing. Bad product? Why don't you look into Dr. DeSmet's research? Or Dr. Amstutz? Do you know anything about cup coverage and the importance that plays? Or how about the cement mantle? I'm betting that you have only drank the Kool-Aid your company has given you and failed to do any investigating on your own. You're obviously not a top rep with your company because if you were you'd know your competition. And yes we are not one of the "Big Boys", but being able to fly under the radar has its advantages.