More Sanofi shenanigans coming to light

Discussion in 'Sanofi' started by MAN-onymous, May 25, 2011 at 1:55 AM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. MAN-onymous

    MAN-onymous Guest


  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    If you believed your product was superior to a generic, I'd do anything to prevent it becoming available. The company only had added revenue in mind but, really, has a crime been committed here?
     
  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    The result: A majority of the subjects continued to obey to the end—believing they were delivering 450 volt shocks—simply because the experimenter commanded them to. Although subjects were told about the deception afterward, the experience was a very real and powerful one for them during the laboratory hour itself. Stanley Milgram 1963
     
  4. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Someone will be held accountable for this from a criminal standpoint. Maybe that's why some of the changes in the us. They can run, but they can't hide.
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Lets start with durzo, irbiniack, wildly, moison and balser.

    Can you say payola?????


     
  6. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    What part of this did you miss reading?

    "paying off doctors to lobby the FDA against generics was a drug company strategy – and that's wholly unacceptable. The FDA needs to work closely with doctors, so we must ensure that doctors' sole motivation is the well-being of their patients."

    The issue is not whether the generic was as good as our product, or not, it is whether we PAID to influence the campaign. I'm not happy about losing Lovenox, or any other product to generic competition, but that is the industry we are in. It was true for Lasix in the 80's and it will be true for Lantus in a few years. Let's not do stupid things to shoot ourselves in the foot, though.