Xarelto spokesman Vickers gets blood clot

Discussion in 'Janssen' started by Anonymous, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:52 AM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest


  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Except he was not on Xarelto when it happened. He seems prone to DVTs. Xarelto worked great when he was on it. And Eliquis is NOT superior in DVT or PE. By the way, did Eliquis study anything in that study but the easiest to treat patients. Excluded trauma, cancer, minimal PEs...
     
  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Let me take a wild guess here: You're a former Risperdal guy. Welcomed with open arms by the scum at JBI.
     
  4. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Vickers had far too many risk factors to be treated with Eliquis.
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Any clinical information you would like to share with patients on your TV commercials?
    Real nice commercial showing 3 known personalities playing golf and joking around.

    Did see this on the commercial: For people with AFib currently well managed on warfarin, there is limited information on how XARELTO® and warfarin compare in reducing the risk of stroke.

    You say you've studied many patients, but how did those patients do versus the comparator?
    Let's see the Forest plots, for both efficacy and safety, for subgroups: renally impaired, chads scores etc.

    Where's the beef? I mean data?
     
  6. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Where's the BEEF? No, Where's the FABS?
    Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaabs!!!!!

    he da man!
     
  7. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Really? I'm quite sure in the safety endpoint of the Eliquis DVT and PE study demonstrated superiority compared to Enox/Warfarin. This is why so many customers do not trust pharma companies and pharma reps because there are so many idiots like you that can not share truth when it comes to clinical data.
     
  8. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    You are talking about safety. I think the previous poster was talking about efficacy.