How 'bout that new law suit ladies

Discussion in 'Masimo' started by Anonymous, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:33 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    There is an ugly word for misaligned people like that it is called hypocriteboob
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    A rare "superbreed" of hypocriteboob has been observed migrating to Washington DC regularly to mate and play pretend.
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Mach speed, Gulfstream G650 is the only way to migrate
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Learn from this sorry quack's self-inflicted undoing.
    You can be patient safety compliant, or be a non-compliant douchebag. Odds are you'll be left alone either way, just own what you are....whatever you are. Refrain however, from testing fate with unsupported claims of higher safety standards and corporate citizenship whilst racking up countless patient safety related violations and charges. Such evident hypocrisy only calls attention to yourself and exposes the superdouche you really are. Just ask jo.
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Seriously! If you want to inspire others with your fine example and commitment to patient safety, then first of all how about not getting caught/penalized by the feds like Masimo for consistently putting patients in harm's way by failing to comply with the agency's most basic patient safety standards. Seriously? Won't somebody say Shut the hell up!
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    If consistent, long term non-compliance with federal patient safety regs is unacceptable for any medical device company, much less one that's run by a self-proclaimed patient safety expert, then what about this scenario involving the same company and CEO running it:
    "The highest ranking Masimo executives, including its Chairman and CEO, Joe Kiani, knew about the failures of SpHb technology forced their sales staff to sell the SpHb devices anyway in the face of knowledge that the devices could seriously endanger patients lives and were unrepentant in the arbitration despite a wealth of evidence of wrong-doing.'
    https://www.scribd.com/mobile/document/206959317/Masimo-Arbitration
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/analyst-alert-multi-million-dollar-punitive-damage-award-won-by-bonagofsky-weiss-dickson-geesman-against-masimo-corporation-2014-02-13
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    He is just living up to his reputation that's all. At least he is predictable.
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    There is something so cute and adolescent about a boy spinning bullshit all day about his imaginary superpowers and saving lives.
     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    When the boy is 5 and harmless maybe. not 50 something and guilty of fraud, malice and oppression, and facing charges of non-compliance, negligence and product liability, among other despicable offenses. Nothing cute about that boy.
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    maybe the travel ban gods will save us
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Lol! All of a sudden the travel ban makes sense.
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Getting shamed by the feds for serial insubordination and wrong-doing is one thing. Facing charges of Wrongful Death is quite another. If truth can't set you free, there's always affirmative defense warfare and statute of limitations.
    http://www.birminghamtimes.com/2014/03/premature-baby-lawsuit-alleges-uab-experiment-flawed/
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Lapse of statute of limitations can't help a guy out of murder charges, but can drop his Wrongful Death charges like a rotten potato. Just ask "saved by the bell" jo.
    https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-alnd-2_13-cv-00733/pdf/USCOURTS-alnd-2_13-cv-00733-0.pdf
     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Thats a rotten cup 'o Joe
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Why would anyone want to limit victims of medical malpractice from recovering their damages? Under what circumstances on earth does that make any sense?
    "If hospitals implement evidence-based practices [such as those authored/promoted by Maimo] they should be shielded from malpractice lawsuits to the fullest extent possible, such as through an affirmative defense and limits on damages."
    Joe Kiani, Founder and CEO, Masimo
    https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Kiani.pdf
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Unacceptable! Kiani's failure to disclose his executive role at Masimo Co. when addressing the Senate committee is hard to believe. Introducing himself only as a founder of a non-profit patient safety foundation, Kiani proceeded to advise the senate to...(get this!)...Limit malpractice lawsuits and extend legal safe-harbor for med tech companies at risk of penalties ands costs related to preventable pt harm??? Gee, who benefits from this agenda?

    Non-disclosure + misaligned incentive = conflict of interest
     
  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I'd say that's closer false personation than just non-disclosure
     
  18. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    false impersonation, hypocrisy, potāto, potôto
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Much like compliance regs and statistical outliers, full disclosure can be a surefire threat to desired outcomes. Hence the systematic disregard or exclusion of such viable info by certain manufacturers. Just ask joe.
     
  20. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Shame on the senate committee's chairman, for letting a sheep-clad wolf into his henhouse. Oh wait a minute...the dude's on masi's board of directors now. Never mind!
    https://www.biospace.com/News/retired-u-s-senator-tom-harkin-joins-180-medicals/403421/%5Ccompany_profile.aspx?CompanyId=1009294