Tritanium Cup Issues

Discussion in 'Stryker' started by anonymous, Oct 9, 2017 at 6:31 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    When we have the newer cup out that addresses a ‘problem we don’t have’ they’ll quietly pull the 1st gen cups out of circulation.
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    The same as every other company does? Depuy has a new cup coming to replace pinnacle, what’s the story with that?
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Pinnacle has been on the market for 15ish years. It was originally designed to accept poly, metal and ceramic liners back when alternate bearings were popular. Makes sense that they'd eventually come out with something with an dual articulation option at some point. Haven't heard of any cup loosening/lysis problems with Pinnacle either. And this is coming from a Stryker rep.
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Revised two of our own cups last week. Both less than two years out. For the first time ever the Dr asked how we reported revisions and said he had a joint surgeon buddy out East that recently switched from Stryker cups. No clue who that doc is or the details, but I haven't seen a cup come out that easily since my DePuy/ASR days.
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Nobody here cares unless you have a quip about a Stryker's reps and cocaine abuse.
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I’m surprised Stryker reps even need cups with all the steroid abuse.
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    tritanium primary cups pulled from nyu langone
     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    We don’t have a problem with cup loosening or trunion issues. We didn’t redesign our tritanium cup and no one has identified any issues. Oh wait....
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Just saw my 3rd loose Tritanium P cup......

    .....of about 3000 implanted.

    Yeah I'm not worried.....and I'd focus on something else....like promising docs free robots for their ASCs if they would convert back to ZB.

    ....or explaining why they need a collar on their undersized pressfit stem to keep it from subsiding, if I were a Depuy rep.
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    lol no they weren't.
     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Stryker is basically giving away makos so I don’t see how ZB doing that is a problem. End game is implant use anyways.

    Collared stems have a great track record. Can’t argue with the clinical data on Corai. Trident 2/ accolade 2, well not so much.
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Another tritanium primary revision. No ingrowth and just fell out.
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    How has this thing not been recalled? I’m surprised the lawyers aren’t jumping on this
     
  18. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Another one....
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    We had one “fall out” like everyone said here. This isn’t a joke. Havasu Regional Medical Center new hospital employed surgeon. If stryker is paying attention I hope this case was documented correctly after the fact. Lifepoint hospitals are aware of the problem on this side.