Our HARTS yes harts and prayers go out to them

Discussion in 'Political Discussions' started by Doc Who, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:05 PM.

  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    This post made you weep? Fruitcake !!!:confused:
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You idiot, the person I was responding to was claiming his post was going to make me weep.

    But hey, thanks for self-identifying as a dishonest idiot! :D
     
  3. ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

    ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    17
    Once again, Doc Pooh, you are the one who started this thread and declared: We want action. The onus is on you to tell us what that action is that you so adamantly declared we need.

    But, we already know the answer, and that is you are clueless for a solution. That's what you liberals do: demand action, but offer nothing to that end. You always want big gobmnt to do things for you.
     
  4. Vagitarian

    Vagitarian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    23,707
    Likes Received:
    247
    This is an interesting point. Uber lobbies do this. But uber conservatives SAY they don't yet when it comes to what type society do they want to live in they would never be without rules. They cherry pick the rules. Why do we need speed limits and traffic lights? Wouldn't it save us tax money if we abandoned all that and just let individual motorists 'do something about it'?
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    And this is why you're the idiot boy.

    Conservatives are for LIMITED government properly executed.

    You try to make it appear that they are for chaos and anarchy which there is absolutely no basis for anywhere.

    You post absolute tripe and on another thread you claimed to be a good citizen. Here's a tip for you, you can't be a good citizen when you are completely ignorant of our Constitution and the basics of our government as you are as evidenced by ignorant posts like yours above.
     
  6. Doc Who

    Doc Who Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    15
    How is this for a start: This guy was old enough to buy the AR-15 but not old enough to buy a beer. Maybe the age should be raised to 25 to buy such a weapon. But in this instance I don't think it would have helped.
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    LOL! Typical libtard response. Proposing a "solution" that even they know won't be effective.

    So you really want to propose that a guy can't buy a rather basic, rather old technology semi-automatic rifle for 7 years after he can use an M-16 with full auto capacity in the military?

    That is a much more appropriate standard of comparison than the beer comparison.
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Our country did just fine in the years when men went to service at 18 yet some states had lower than 21 drinking age. What is needed is to screen, qualify and limit purchases to only responsible, mature adults, not sell them to 19 year old kids. It takes some intelligence to build and set off a bomb. It doesn't take any intelligence to pull the trigger on a 30-round capacity semi-automatic weapon when you ambush your prey.
     
  9. Vagitarian

    Vagitarian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    23,707
    Likes Received:
    247
    I wonder how many more millions Rubio will get from the NRA and Scott to be sure we continue to make assault rifles available to teenagers—in Florida they can’t buy hand guns but can buy assault rifles —Interesting—
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    How ridiculous! At 18, people are considered adults for most purposes. If you can be sent to war at 18 you should be able to buy a semiautomatic rifle.

    You're the one who needs to grow up.
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You expose yourself as an ignorant libtard yet again. What the NRA donates to pols is a fraction of what organizations like unions donate but you believe the myth that the NRA buys politicians with money.

    If you want to save lives you outlaw abortion and don't give teenagers drivers licenses. So see, you're exposed as a hypocritical fool. You don't really care about saving lives.
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Absurd, if you want to save lives outlaw cars. Then teenagers won't be having sex in them and fetues will not need to be aborted. ;)
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Epic fail. :rolleyes:
     
  14. ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

    ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    17
    You so clearly demonstrate the demented logic of the leftwing loons: Do something event though you know it won't work. Deprive law abiding citizens of Constitutional rights for changes that don't matter. Pure Liberal/DemoKKKrat mentality.
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    People like you are relics and dinosaurs.
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    So Reagan was a left-wing loon?
     
  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Nah, we just stand in timeless principles and values while fools like you get rope a doped by loons.
     
  18. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    No he was simply kind hearted and sympathetic and made the mistake of setting logic aside because he felt responsible that James Brady had been horribly wounded.

    Regardless, we've found out through experience that "assault weapons" bans are ineffective but you're the kind of fool that can't even learn from experience. You're simply a useful idiot.

    Now go climb back under your rock cause I just set your Reagan trump card afire! :D
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    So if assault weapons bans are si ineffective, please document for us the number of students school shot by semi auto rifles during the ban vs. the number of students shot since.

    C'mon, do it. ;)
     
  20. anonymous

    anonymous Guest