Davinci- what a scam

Discussion in 'Intuitive Surgical Patient Discussions' started by Anonymous, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:09 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest



    ❤❤
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    HAIKU is never gone
    It is always here
    It is always there
    There is no start
    There is no finish
    Circle of infinity

    HAIKU
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I hate what you have done to all the innocent lives you touched.
    I hate the pain you have caused.
    I hate the stress and the sleepless nights.
    I hate the physical pain and the emotional pain you have inflicted upon us.
    I hate that at times I thought it may have been better if I had died because I just couldn't take anymore of the pain and anguish you have caused me.
    I hate what you have done to all the families.
    And don't think for a minute they weren't and aren't affected by this.
    I hate the scars inside and out. They are both there for life.
    I hate having to doubt and mistrust.
    I hate wondering and worrying what will happen next to my body.
    I hate that you think you can hurt and not face any consequences.
    I hate that you have no compassion or remorse.
    I hate that it's still happening.
    You will hear my voice and that I will promise you!
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    HAIKU
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Let love explode and bring DWAS to life
    A love so bold
    To seek a revolution somehow
    Let love explode and bring DWAS to life
    A love so bold
    To bring a revolution somehow
    Now I'm lost in Your freedom
    In this world I'll overcome
    DWAS IS not dead
    we're surely alive we're living on the inside
    Roaring like a lion
    DWAS IS NOT dead
    we're surely alive
    we're living on the inside
    Roaring like a lion
    Roaring, we're roaring, we're roaring like a lion
    Let hope arise and make the darkness hide
    My faith is dead I need resurrection somehow
    Now I'm lost in Your freedom
    In this world I'll overcome
    DWAS IS NOT not dead
    we're surely alive
    we're living on the inside
    Roaring like a lion
    DWAS IS Not dead
    we're surely alive
    We're living on the inside
    Roaring like a lion
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    HAIKU
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I am deceit
    I am greed
    I am innovation
    I am assault
    I am murder
    I am the future
    I am robotic surgery
    Circle of infinity

    HAIKU
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Under California's “products liability” laws, someone who designs, manufactures or sells a defective product is strictly liable for injuries caused by that product -- even when that person or company was not negligent.1

    In California, strict liability can be imposed for three types of product defects:

    We discuss each of the specific type of California product liability cases in the articles linked to above.

    And to help you better understand how to prevail in a products liability lawsuit in Californiagenerally, our California personal injury lawyersdiscuss, below:
     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    The “elements” of a California products liability claim
    Each type of products liability claim requires proof of slightly different elements. In general, however, to prevail on a claim for products liability in California a plaintiff must prove four things:

    1. That the defendant designed, manufactured, distributed or sold a defective product;
    2. That the product contained the defect when it left the defendant's possession;
    3. That the plaintiff used the product in a reasonably foreseeable manner; and
    4. That the plaintiff suffered harm as a result of the defect.
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    What is “strict liability” in a products liability case?
    Usually, to be liable for a plaintiff's injuries, a defendant must have done (or failed to do) something with negligence, gross negligence, recklessness or the intent to cause harm.

    But in rare circumstances, a defendant may be strictly liable for a plaintiff's injuries even when the defendant did nothing wrong.

    Under California law, if a product is more dangerous than it should be – or it contains inadequate warnings – whoever designs, makes, or sells the defective product is strictly liable for any injuries that result when the product is used in a reasonably foreseeable way.
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Use of a product in a “reasonably foreseeable” way
    California law requires manufacturers to anticipate how the average consumer will use -- and even misuse -- a product.3

    If the way a consumer uses or misuses the product was reasonably foreseeable and such use or misuse injures someone, the defendant(s) will be held strictly liable.

    This doesn't necessarily mean the manufacturer or designer must completely eliminate a danger. Many useful, every day products are inherently dangerous when misused (or even when used).

    But people who make dangerous products must take reasonable precautions to minimize the harm that may result from them.

    Depending on the circumstances, this can involve the design or manufacturing of a product, or simply inspecting the product or issuing adequate warnings about its dangers.

    It is up to a jury to determine whether the defendant took reasonable precautions and whether the plaintiff's use was reasonably foreseeable.
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Praise Magnus for California and their liberal product liability laws!
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Hit a nerve?
     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    Who is Magnus??
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    He is a man
    He is a prophet
    He is a robot fighter
    He is an inspiration
    He is a leader
    He is a poet
    He is a robot slapper
    He is an expert in garage door repair
    He is Magnus

    HAIKU
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    WOW !!!
     
  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    DWAS is dead.
     
  18. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Breach of Express Warranty
    Express warranties are typically contained in sales contracts or when a seller expressly promises that a product will perform in a particular way. A sales contract contains express promises and can be submitted in court as proof of a breach. When a verbal promise by a salesman is at issue, it can be more challenging for a plaintiff's attorney to prove, especially since some sales contracts specifically state that a salesperson's warranty is not binding.

    For example, when trying to sell a washing machine, a salesperson might advise the consumer that a particular model makes no noise. If it turns out that the washing machine makes a noise, the consumer might be able to sue for breach of express warranty. It may be difficult to prove, however, that the salesperson made that promise.

    Under the Uniform Commercial Code, when a seller excludes all express warranties, it does not matter what he or she said about the goods. The buyer has agreed not to rely on oral statements.

    Implied Warranty of Merchantability
    An implied warranty of merchantability is a guarantee that the product does not have design defects, manufacturing defects, or improper labels. A manufacturer or seller, in holding out a product for sale, makes an implied promise that the product is fit for the purposes for which that product or similar products are sold. For example, if a power drill is packaged as being useful for drilling any material and only drills certain materials, this could be because of a design defect or a manufacturing defect. In addition to a claim for either design defects or manufacturing defects, a plaintiff could also sue for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability.
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    We are all Magnus today...
     
  20. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Yes, too many of the DWAS members are dead.


    MAUDE - Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience
    • [​IMG]
    278 records meeting your search criteria returned- Manufacturer: intuitive surgical Event Type: Death Report Date From: 01/01/2000 Report Date To: 03/19/2018

    Manufacturers and importers must submit reports when they become aware of information that reasonably suggests that one of their marketed devices may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or has malfunctioned and the malfunction of the device or a similar device that they market would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. Manufacturers must send reports of such deaths, serious injuries and malfunctions to the FDA. Importers must send reports of deaths and serious injuries to the FDA and the manufacturer, and reports of malfunctions to the manufacturer.