Election Model That's Never Wrong Predicts Trump Win in 2020

Discussion in 'Political Discussions' started by YouDidn'tBuildThat, Oct 15, 2019 at 6:52 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. OccupyThis

    OccupyThis Guest

    Michelle who? Michelle Pfeiffer?

    In what ways are Michelle Obama "their best candidate?" Why not Oprah or Whoopey? These 2 a more qualified than Michelle Obama.

    No substance in any of your posts.

    The progressives tried to make the American people think that Hillary could not lose. Now, the left is trying to make the American people think that Trump can't lose. But this is not going to work either. The democrats are going to lose here again. And it's their own fault because they embrace a bankrupt and criminal party now.

    The American people will once again rise up and fight by President Trump's side. Americans want to go out and vote for Trump - to be a part of history when the people took America back from the left wing radicals who've been trying to destroy everything they have.

    It's going to be a landslide for Trump.

    Telling Americans that Trump is guaranteed to win, will not succeed in keeping them from going out and voting for Trump. Maybe progressives would do better in politics if they focused on solving problems and doing the jobs they're elected to do INSTEAD of trying to manipulate people and trying to manipulate what people think. This is one of the biggest reasons why Democrats can't win. Nobody wants criminals and liars in charge. Not in Washington, and not on forums like this one.

    Food for thought Vag.
     

  2. Vagitarian

    Vagitarian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    23,722
    Likes Received:
    247
    I know you love to twist and mis-represent my posts because I expose your stupidity on a daily basis. You're still pissed that I correctly assessed Bolton as a neo-con, warmongering Bushie and numerous people agree. Once again my key point on this post was: 'And the Dem shit-show continues to deconstruct.'

    If you want to try and pick that apart with your junior attorney-at-large hobby tactics , go for it. You agree with my bottom line, you just want a fight on the picayune shit.

    I am on record as saying Trump will win this in a landslide. The good news is I'm leaving for Phoenix in the morning so you can spin your wheels 100 mph in neutral by yourself. My Phoenix contingency who made the post about meeting Bolton and assessing him as a neo-con Bushie may fill in at times.

    See ya on the flip-flop. ;)
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Not the “Sparky” that you were responding to but hey I am Sparky and we are legion. LOL!

    Get this straight, nobody does to you what you do to others which is lie and misrepresent their positions and statements. And the only person’s stupidity you expose is your own! Case closed.

    Oh, and I’m supposed to be impressed that a few folks agree with you on Bolton? Give me a break. :rolleyes:
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    And I'm not V but we are legion. Get this straight, Sparky and his ilk distort most everything and saddest of all, interpret the constitution from the uber, uber right. This current administration has been an embarrassment. Our country is not a family operated cottage industry. This is not sustainable. The fall will be sudden and hard. :rolleyes:
     
  5. OccupyThis didn't twist or misrepresent your posts Vag.

    You've been caught red handed lying and then lying some more to try and cover your lies.

    Why else would you erase your own topic? We all read your lies.
     
  6. Why don't you try providing us with examples of how exactly Sparky and his ilk interpret the Constitution from the uber uber right?

    It's like you just make this stuff up as you go Vag.
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Stealing my bit doesn’t work for you. We don’t go around calling anon posters V all the time. Your post deteriorates even worse from there. We interpret the Constitution faithfully according to original intent. It just seems Uber right to you cause you’re Uber left and totally unmoored from the clear meaning of the text.

    Trump is objectively doing a great job. Want to call him embarrassing then fine, I’ll go along with you on the condition that it’s understood that Obama was just as embarrassing and far more totalitarian than Trump ever thought about being. The objective record is clear there as well.

    You make a fool of yourself.
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Not Vag but challenge you to do the same on the Uber left.
     
  9. I never claimed that progressive democrats interpret the constitution for the "uber uber" left. They violate the Constitution on a daily basis.

    Again (we know it's you Vag), give us some examples of how we on this forum interpret the Constitution from the uber uber right.

    You made the claim, so it's time to back it up - put up or shut up.
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Wow! You may not be Vag but you’re just like him, lazy and low class. AFTER you have answered the question that was posed to YOU first, then get back to us. Till then you’re just using a cheap tactic when you couldn’t keep your yap shut as you should have.
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Typical sidestep - or should we say, 'lateral arabesque'? LMFAO...……...
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You’d have been better off just admitting that you’d been nailed. This only makes you look worse. Your side was posed a question first. Answer it or lose by default.
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    the Moody’s model got 2016 wrong. Times are way different and these models are no longer useful. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly in the Trump favorite column of the poorly educated. Cue Sparky and LibsLuv
     
  14. OccupyThis

    OccupyThis Guest

    How are times different Vag? And tell us why these models are no longer useful. Being right every time but one in 40 years? Sounds pretty useful to me. Why don't you set us all straight here?

    We'll all be waiting on the edge of our seats for your substantive reply!
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You’re in the same rut with you Vag obsession as some are with the Sparky obsession. Vag has consistently predicted a solid Trump victory so what is your point on this model? He seems to have made some valid points in that Trump might do well to focus on leading our country instead of all the fighting. At any rate it’s Trumps to lose so how about we just watch?
     
  16. OccupyThis

    OccupyThis Guest

    You didn't make a comment about Trump. You claimed that these models predicting the outcome of elections are no longer useful and that that times have changed. Then I asked you to explain how so?

    Vag predicting a Trump victory (my grandma made the same prediction by the way), has nothing to do with the discussion we've been having.

    You made the claim that these prediction models are no longer useful - back it up here. I realize that Progressive Democrats generally aren't real good at thinking critically. They often make stupid comments like yours here and they even try to make it sound like they know what they're talking about. But they just don't know their own arses from holes in the ground. Prove me wrong here - now's your chance!
     
  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    How is Trump supposed to knock off all the fighting when he’s merely responding to vicious attacks. His fighting is overwhelmingly defensive.
     
  18. Doc Who

    Doc Who Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    15
    And should $rump cheat a second term he will be responsible for the downfall of the Obama economy. But U repubs will invent a phony excuse to help U feel better.
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!

    You’re constantly saying stupid stuff but this may be the most stupid ever!

    “Downfall of the Obama economy”?????

    Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

    Obama has an anemic growth rate which was propped up by pumping huge amounts of super cheap money into the economy.
     
  20. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Super cheap money? Bwahahahaaaaaaa. Too funny.