Inomax

Discussion in 'Mallinckrodt' started by anonymous, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:49 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Do you think inomax will be approved for covid19
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    No. There is a cheaper fix already. The malaria drug is pennies.
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Yes, it is already being used in over 40 hospitals directly on COVID19 patients.
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Hydrochloroquine will no nothing once you need a ventilator. Inomax may help you oxygenate your blood. Plus there is really no outcome data associate with chloroquine, as lower viral loads does not necessarily mean anything.
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    ARDS data isn't very good. The only clinicians that will use INOmax on COVID 19 patients will do it as a last resort.
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I would hope that they would be trying inomax when a patient was experiencing hypoxic respiratory distress. Applying any pharmaceutical to a patient with multi organ failure (ARDS) has limited efficacy.
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Are you looking for your next overpriced drug to take advantage of out heath care system? Scum
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    They would have done it about 10 years ago when Ikaria didn't charge for therapy hours over 96.

    Now that they charge for every single hour, the usage will be extremely limited especially with limited efficacy.
     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Yes, companies make money. It seems like you have figured it all out. Congrats!
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    They have cheaper options. Much cheaper.
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Letting patients die IS always the cheaper option. I would hope efficacy matters.
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    Clearly you have little or no medical background- they would not and will not use it.
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    There is cheaper gas. You are certainly full of it. No one said anyone wanted someone dead. That’s you. There are cheaper options that are efficacious. Go read some stuff it may help that little brain
     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I’m just saying it would be crazy to rule out a treatment based on cost without any data. I would hope we would all be eagerly awaiting any clinical trial results that might come out so that we could weigh the cost-benefit ratio. Making snap judgements rarely benefit anyone.
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    are u 2 still talking. I keep falling asleep.
    What I’m hearing is bla bla bla Inomax great bla bla bla it’s too expensive bla bla bla small brain bla good gas bla bla bla
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    The studies were done by several institutions many years ago

    There is no benefit of using Inomax in patients with ARDS
     
  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    whose stupid idea is this to start this study?
     
  18. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Do any of you understand financial P&Ls? We are fuked. It’s over. I’m starting to think our leadership, I use that term as a whore uses cok, doesn’t think we get it. HUgh and Mark, no one wants to see your dumb videos on bull shti. You managed it all horribly. Fuk you
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    A registry comparing term/near term babies to preemies with pulmonary hypertension?

    Paying off some of that mountain of debt would have been a better choice.