Should Reps be in the Field Still?

Discussion in 'TherapeuticsMD' started by anonymous, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:17 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
?

Should reps still be in the field?

  1. Keep reps in the field regardless of potential risk

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Pull the reps until the virus is controlled

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    This is the dumbest comment I’ve ever seen.
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    We can’t be afraid to live life!!!! Jesus the whole world is a bunch of pu$$*€$!!!! Go and friggin work- some people don’t have the luxury of a JOB! Cry baby snowflakes
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    We can’t live in fear for the rest of our lives!!! The whole world is a bunch of p$&&@$/!!!! Do your JOB- some people dont have that LUXURY right now!!! Bunch of cry baby millennials who think they are entitled to 100K salary when they just got their drivers license!!!!
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Haha. What a sad way to live life. I agree with the last few comments. Go live your life. If you dont want your job, then there's a long line of ppl that would take your place. Just say the word.
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    This is the best job I’ve ever had. The money is good. I work with great people and sell awesome products. How awesome is our boss Chelsea!!
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Wait til you get laid off with no severance just like the others. But look on the bright side, you’ll be able to visit offices during a pandemic with your wonderful manager very soon
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    The model was already shifting towards remote online communication with doctors anyway. You see it everywhere with doctors having online appointments with their patients. You can cut expenses by drastically downsizing the Business Intelligence group. Dead wood like Vanize, C Starr haven’t brought any value towards impacting sales.
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    C Starr will be gone soon. The analysts under him are both gone or let go and he will be next.
     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Heard CS never let them do anything or even talk to anyone, so probably that’s why the company let them go since they were just sitting ducks
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You are correct. He would show up 15-30 minutes late for every meeting, or just postpone to another day, as if only his time was valued. For one candidate’s interview, he spent the entire time looking down at his laptop, instead of engaging in dialog. The candidate was older and had experience on C Starr, so he let him go a few months later because of the threat.
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    so that’s why he probably hired the new ones with no experience in pharma. Now it all makes sense. I think one of the new guys was actually good and helpful. What a shame.
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You might be talking about the same guy he canned without warning. Created a dummy meeting for follow-up to a project the guy was working on, have him wait 15 minutes while C Starr clears out his cubicle - then shows up with HR to eliminate the guy and throw him out in the street. No severance. It’s the TherapeuticsMD way.
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    what the ....???? Are you serious??? I do not know if that’s the same guy but wow unbelievable. And heard now Vanize doesn’t like CS when she was the one that let him loose and do whatever he wanted. What a freaking circus.
     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Vanize is nice to look at, but we’re not exactly splitting atoms here. She’s a control freak, so C Starr running rampant without her buy-in could conceivably cause problems. During one meeting with IT on the concept of what a team is, she wouldn’t let anyone from BI answer. She thought she knew everything that C Starr did with his team - and she was wrong.

    They’ve had some talent on the BI team over the last 1-2 years, but with lousy management like Vanize and C Starr - it was wasted talent that is no longer with the company. Ultimately, Mitch Krassan is the signal caller for BI, and as long as you suck up to him and listen to incessant stories about his son, or how great his wife was as a pharmaceutical rep.. you’ll have a job.
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Vanize is nice to look at, but we’re not exactly splitting atoms here. She’s a control freak, so what you’re saying about her relationship with C Starr is not surprising. During one meeting with IT to discuss the topic of ‘team’, she wouldn’t let anyone from BI answer. She thought she knew everything that C Starr did with his team, like regular meetings and 1-on-1s, but she was wrong. If C Starr didn’t like you, he ignored you like you didn’t exist. BI has had some talent over the last year or more, but thanks to lousy management like Vanize and C Starr, most of it is gone.

    Ultimately, Mitch K calls the shots on BI - so if you can stomach his incessant stories about his son, or how great his wife was in the field and models all his decisions on what she did - then you’ll have a job with the company.
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Lol what a joke
     
  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    But heard some BI team members now report directly to Mitch so they know neither Vanize nor C Starr are capable to be managers for BI hahaha
     
  18. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Who are you kidding, Vanize has Mitch rapped around her finger. Her fine ass will be around as long as Mitchell is.
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Huh. So her new boss Adam has no say in why her dept still has so many IT people. What a freakin joke
     
  20. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    The reorg would’ve happened towards the latter part of 2019, when they were investigated for age discrimination. C Starr didn’t like the old guy so he let him go.