Our 1 time Covid shot is a dog

Discussion in 'Johnson & Johnson' started by anonymous, Jan 29, 2021 at 5:17 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I’m a little surprised how poor the data was. It’s basically like taking only 1 of the Moderna shots, without the booster. Not good enough for widespread use.
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    Certainly a bit disappointing, but it will be used globally. Even with a lower efficacy it will make a huge impact in fighting covid. Keep in mind it’s about as effective as the vaccine for the normal flu. While there are plenty of things to criticize our company about, I really don’t think this is one of them. Let’s not bash just to bash.
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Give it a few weeks / months and they will say we now recommend two shots and not one. Doubling our profit and increasing the effectiveness.
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    No one in their right mind would take a vaccine nearly 50% less effective than the standard of care (96% vs our 66%). By the time our 2 shot studies come out most will be vaccinated- it’s time to move on
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    [​IMG]
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    yeah, typical J&J, lots of hype, lots of emails, lots of $$$ spent, then deliver nothing. Hype again. Then rinse and repeat.
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Would make a great TV DTC ad- 66% of the time, it works every time! We'll make billions!
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    In two years we will see press releases and emails bragging about the vaccine being 97% effective. By that time we will be fighting a different disease. Sad but Pitiful. And we brag about our innovations, lol. What a joke.
     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Pfizer and Moderna trials were rigged to show maximal efficacy. Less than 1% in placebo group got COVID. The latter demonstrates the extremely low risk of getting COVID in a highly select group of volunteers.

    RNA vaccines will eventually disappear because they are huge PITA logistically and require two jabs. Pharmacy chains already have equipment to store DNA vaccines (ie, refrigerators). Huge capital cost to purchase ultra-cold freezers and probably don't have space to put them.

    For those who got RNA vaccines, would suggest getting tested for antibodies within six weeks. IMHO, confidence in them being prepared properly and ensuring use before they degrade at vaccination centers is pretty low. Better to be on the safe side.
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Oh Sparky, wrong again!

    Coronavirus Disease 2019
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    WE had to have the vaccine release quickly that’s why the data was cut after the first dose. This allows millions of doses on the market for use.
    The May data will reveal a second dose is needed just like Pfizer and Moderna and the efficacy will be on par.
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    As an outsider, I strongly disagree. Most people in my neck of the woods don’t trust the RNA Vaccines, no matter how well they work or how much Fauci/Biden push them. More traditional means of vaccination will be more widely adopted by the masses, it’s not all about efficacy for many people. It’s about safety and most people who aren’t fear mongering will be more apt for a single shot with a more reliable safety profile. Especially the younger population who think about the unknown long term side effects of interfering with your body’s protein production at a chromosomal level...

    As a rep...storage, logistics and supply are limiting factors for RNA Vaccines especially in a non-hospital setting. PCP gives majority of vaccinations for other illnesses and can not afford to buy sub-zero refrigerators. Give it time and the numbers will increase as supply does and PCP is able to get involved and offer it with other routine inoculations...
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You are a complete moron Sparky. Retired with incipient Alzheimer's? "Chromosomal level"....