Has anyone wondered why

Discussion in 'GlaxoSmithKline' started by Anonymous, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:29 AM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    I constantly plead with you to contact the EEOC but have not posted a site to try and recruit you to a law firm. Could it have something to do with the fact I would prefer you to find your own legal representation since class action and mass tort suits are too easy for GSK to make go way but hundreds of small suits will cause them a huge headache and force them to reevaluate the horrible PF POS model. Face the fact that your job is already gone and your fate has been decided by some dweeby actuary sitting in a cubicle in RTP. If you don't take matters into your own hands and soon then you can just get on the cattle car with all the others and head for the unemployment office and sign up for Obama food stamps and health care and you will have nobody to blame but yourself.
     

  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    You will hurt your cause if you bring politics into it. Food stamps have been around way before Obama, so keep your political leanings out of it. Otherwise, your points are valid.
     
  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Still waiting for you to file first.
     
  4. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Politics? Where the hell do you think the CIA, PF and all the diversity mandates came from, the Romney Justice a Department. Having regrets about voting for the absolute worst president in history TWICE?
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    NOW we're finally getting to the real reason of your many months' worth of diatribes. I had a feeling that you had an ulterior motive! Look Bucko, we brought those idiotic policies on ourselves. Cant you get that? The Industry (but especially us and Pfizer) earned those damned massive fines BECAUSE OF THE WRONG that we heaped on the American public. For Pete's sake, show some accountability! That CIA? Our fault. PF? Some idiotic agency's idea that was agreed to by our leadership. How many children did we harm by pushing Paxil for unapproved indications? How many patients were hurt because WE shelved "bad" data showing AEs or inferiority to current therapies? The POTUS (current or past) didn't do that. WE DID! GSK, baby, all the way!

    Really, your fake posts, the lies about attorney offices contacting you, the responding to your own posts (while pretending to be someone else), the pushing of us to file with the EEOC, the pretending to be someone that's witnessed Negros (although I'm pretty sure you call them something else) and others violate policies and go untouched….all of this speaks to someone that has an agenda and is willing to be duplicitous to achieve that agenda.

    I've never said or thought this about anyone before, but it is my hope, sir, that you rot on the unemployment line for 18 months when we have our next round of cuts. That way you'll get a taste of what other industries think of us. And maybe you'll feel guilty that SOME of your hostility needs to be aimed at our C suite for their ineptitude, lack of moral fiber. This diversity crap is small potatoes compared to what really ails this company specifically, and the industry as a whole.
     
  6. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    And don't forget to contact the EEOC.
     
  7. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

     
  8. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    if it looks like a duck, smells like a duck...........................guys, this is obviously one of the lowly bottom-feeder law firms......hope their mommas are proud of them......a very sad profession !
     
  9. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    I never sold Paxil to children. You are the guy who keeps calling us "scumbags for selling paxil to children" trying to pretend he's a rep now. Go take a hike
     
  10. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Hey post #5....I saw you skirt the issue re: the GSK policy of paying people more or less money based the color of their skin. Politics?!?!? You hack, do you ink that's a Bush'esque policy or one coming from THE worst POTUS ever? Well, not him actually but his same sex oriented friend: The Deeds!
     
  11. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    What language are you speaking ?
     
  12. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Besides is it possible I don't like out current potus for his socialist policies rather than the color of his skin. I already sent a political contribution to Ben Carson but since he is not a sniveling progressive then I am still a racist. Geez we know who the real racists are.
     
  13. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    post #5 is valid. I am poster#2, have made no other comments and will stop here. Thank you #5.
     
  14. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Poster #5 here. First of all, you sound like a German officer from WWII. "I vas just vollowing orderss!" http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/business/glaxosmithkline-agrees-to-pay-3-billion-in-fraud-settlement.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

    According to industry outsiders, we are all guilty because we cashed our GSK checks while this mess was going on. If you don't believe me, ask a headhunter that specializes in new business development, or high-paid salespeople or managers how often employers hire ex-GSK field force members. Be prepared to get sick.

    Second point: we got hit for a record $3B fine because of unethical promotion and behaviors. How can you justify suppression of AEs, or promotion of a drug for indications that we KNEW would never get approved? We're unethical, period. So tell me again how some namby-pamby Bullshit so-called "diversity campaign" is ruining our company? It's because of OUR past behaviors that our exalted leaders (PUKE!) signed on to Patient First, easily one of the biggest fiascos in an industry loaded with negative press in the past 15 years. Its because of OUR past practices that we even NEED this BS diversity initiative. Its because of OUR current practice of Patient First that the next 12 months is going to be horrific.

    GSK of 2014 is reaping what GSK of 1998-2013 sowed. Discontent, low morale, and a lack of credibility with a lot of key customers.