I wonder how many fathers and husbands feel about AZ not providing transportation to their daughters and wives to the meeting in DC? I wonder how they feel about AZ telling them to walk the 6 blocks back to their hotel at night? But I'm sure DC is a safe enough city, right? Otherwise why would AZ do something so cheap and irresponsible as to invite lawsuits when something terrible happens.
Do you think that only women are at risk on the streets of DC? That is a pretty sexist comment. This is the kind of statements that get men in trouble in this sick company.
Hey moron - the poster meant that each woman is someone's wife or daughter - take your communications degree and go write elsewhere dipshit
AZ is not obligated to pay for non-employee's personal expenses. Responsible fathers and husbands would pay the price for their loved one's safety. They would not make excuses and look to someone else to do what they should do.
Speaking of the King's English, "you command" should read "your," and English should begin with a capital letter.
Its the Queen's English not King's! It is in reference to the reigning monarch of Great Britain not Martin Luther.
Beg to differ. It could be either. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_King%27s_English "...The book nevertheless remains a benchmark for usage, and is still in print."
COME ON BRO! It's six blocks! Have ya never been to the big city before! Some of us are lucky to park that close to our offices.
AZ is not obligated to pay for non-employee's travel expenses. However, AZ should be required to provide transportation to and from the meeting. I enjoyed the 6 block walks and having to explain to the DC homeless people that I didn't have any cash on me. Thanks AZ.
Those weren't homeless people they were AZ employees layer off in the last downsizing. Oh, I mean, restructuring, or I mean right sizing.
