Why is shire letting a little boy die

What is going on a shire. It looks like you guys are letting a little boy die because you don't want to see if one of drugs will help him..... Just disgusting if true.

And Dr. Flemming Ornskov M.D., MBA, MPH, 56
Chief Exec. Officer and Director makes $ 3.40M a year Does he want to help?

 

I believe most Leadership and most management would let this kid die if the decision was up to them my friend. I know bc I've worked with Shire a long time now... Sad but true

 

I agree. That's my opinion as well. Management and leadership cannot look beyond themselves.

 

This is so odd to me that you keep choosing this forum to try to fight this fight. Seems beyond inappropriate. Rule of life: if you really want something, probably the top way to not get it is by bashing the person who has the control to give it to you. You've shown some interesting character with these posts.

 

It is a bit more complicated than that.

 

We all die, is shire responsible for the death of all of humanity?

 

It is more complicated in terms of potentially delaying approval. Let's face it, however, if it truly was one of the executives of this company it would happen. It just comes down to morality. If a life can be potentially saved, it should happen. It's just that simple.

 

Why yes! They are. Didn't you read the report?