SICD

Discussion in 'Boston Scientific' started by Anonymous, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:38 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Please MADIT RIT and then ask this question again, dummy. You go down that route with your customers and you're advertising your ignorance.
     

  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Madit RIT dumbass.
     
  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    #winning
     
  4. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    So let me get this straight. You sell a device to less than 2% of the ICD candidates that's the size of a pace maker from the 1960's with less than half the battery life of a modern day ICD and delivers over 60% inappropriate shocks and a lead with 5 years data and you're proud of that? Bravo!
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Glen Novarro, RBC Capital Markets Report, July 1, 2014
    * We surveyed ~50 high volume U.S based electrophysiologists across the country. The physicians collectively implant ~5% of total U.S. market volume. The U.S. market share among our respondents is as follows: MDT (39%), BSX (33%), STJ (26%) and other (2%). Our survey highlights several datapoints that are positive for BSX, including share gains in the CRT-D segment of the ICD market and continued momentum of its S-ICD.

    * Survey Suggests Boston's S-ICD Gaining Momentum. Our survey confirms that Boston's S-ICD rollout is gaining momentum, as management continues to make progress in building manufacturing capacity to satisfy demand. On average, we found that our respondents expect to increase their share of S-ICDs to ~16% in 2Q14 and ~18% in 3Q14 (vs. ~14% in 1Q14). We believe the survey is directionally correct, offering a source of potential upside for BSX. For reference, our survey work in the past indicated that S-ICDs would garner mid to high single digit penetration. Moreover, the open commentary is more positive, as compared to our historical surveys. We are noticing that fewer respondents are citing that the S-ICD will play in a niche market and instead seeing more comments like "game changer" and ""very important."


    do*uchebag.
     
  6. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Uneducated and ignorant. Bravo. Kicking ass again like I did 10 years ago. Suck it.
     
  7. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    who the hell is Glen Navaro RBC Capital?????? You guys would listen to preschoolers for advice just like you bought a company from a bunch of Guidant rejects.....you're right, you are selling technology from 10 years ago....must feel good to back in the saddle talking about technology you can actually understand. Just shock the hell out of the pt and maybe the device will guess right. Bravo!
     
  8. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

     
  9. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Um this was developed 10 years ago and brought to market about 1 year ago. We call it innovation. You really need to shut up. Your ignorance deepens with each post.