http://www.pharmabiz.com/NewsDetails.aspx?aid=84252&sid=2 You guys pay docs to see if pacemakers help with bradycardia too? This is the type if science you promote with your studies. Holy joke of a research department.
I wondered about this study, this morning....wonder what they paid? And whether they lost any programmers to FU, to boost the findings.....
I hope you guys are older than 60, if you are not, you are up for a rude awakening, you see, nowadays companies are looking for ways to get rid of service, maybe the most expensive part for a company, and remote monitoring is the best way of doing this, they are just finding ways for this to work and it is important to know if the patients are going to accept it. Good luck if you think this is only a way to get business from a doctor.
They are doing a study that includes seeing if extending the AV delay with decrease v pacing. It pays 1500 a patient.
Not true…. that study was completed back around 2004/5 right after MDT paid docs $3,000 a patient for their MVP trial.
Hilarious. You guys came on here and started this thread from your own Glass House. No device company owns the moral high ground. If the glass house argument really meant something to you, you'd recognize the sheer irony of your suggesting I should hold MY tongue. Cretin.
Oh. We dealt with our issue straight up. No other lead recall was handled as well as Fidelis. Linox not so well. So much for the VDD. Leads are falling apart.