Alkermes

Discussion in 'Sunovion' started by Anonymous, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:04 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    When you are separated, you are offered a severance.
    If you accept, you sign a contract buying your silence.
     

  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    The severance doesn't buy silence from a whistleblower suit. If it is strong enough it is brought on by the government, they just want the info. The government doesn't care about a severance contrsct. Illegal is illegal. Get the info and file. It is all available on the internal drive.
     
  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Just wondering hypothetically if the Feds showed up on such a persons doorstep if that person who did sign might then talk ??? No agreements can keep you from talking in an investigation.

    Just curious how receptive or protective such an individual might be......
     
  4. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Internal drive ?? We don't need an internal person at this point. I just need MO.
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    What is on the internal drive ?
     
  6. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

     
  7. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    MO is late to the game. You need to be the first one in.
     
  8. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Have you watched the news recently? IRS scandal, VA scandal. Those in charge plead the 5th or deny, deny deny. No ramifications.
     
  9. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    In most cases you are right. The company will settle for a fine before admitting guilt which is fine for the government. If they take it to trial and loose or refuse to cooperate and settle some may get jail time because of paper trails that they leave behind. Tap employees did jail time. 98.9% of all cases brought by the government are settled before trial which is why the government only takes 9% of all whistleblower cases filed. They only take the ones they will win.
     
  10. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Can MO blow the whistle on himself?
     
  11. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    What makes you so sure that MO is late. Obviously no one has had the guts or the proof to file or else something would have broke by now.
     
  12. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    A S was fired and now says M O was forced out. What a nut job!
     
  13. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    The nut jobs, are the people who were clueless,when MO and Dr Garcia we're fired.
    M O using a consultant as a rep is illegal.
     
  14. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    100% of the Latuda launch was dangerous & illegal but the FEDS seriously don't care. Outstanding & ethical people who took a stand were fired to clear the way for easy profits.
     
  15. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    MO not fired. Left on his own terms. Stop lying
     
  16. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    MO not fired. Left on his own terms. Stop lying
     
  17. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    I already left you dumb ass. Recruiters telling me about other Sunovion losers desparate to jump ship. I get a kick out of coming back to the Sunovion board to see what you losers are up to
     
  18. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Riiggghttt! You keep on believing that you crayon eating dork
     
  19. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Obviously you don't know anything about the process. If someone has filed you wouldn't know anything. It stays under seal in some cases 3-4 years before anyone knows. On average it takes the government 2 years to decide and investigate. Until then it remains sealed. So when they say they want MO it doesn't matter because the money goes to the first one filed unless MO has significantly more info then he can aid in the one already filed. Hope this helps
     
  20. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Pure curiosity.... "first to file", were you fired ?