Message to Deb in the Vaccines Business Unit

Discussion in 'GlaxoSmithKline' started by Anonymous, Sep 29, 2013 at 8:38 AM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Thanks for your valuable feedback
     

  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Nice try and stop projecting your own stupidity buddy. No one wants the Sr Dir Trade Strategy position at GSK so the VBU has to look externally.
     
  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Heyyyyyy what happened to MH at HQs??? She was with us for a long time and gets whacked right after she goes inside and gets promoted?
     
  4. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Seriously rude..mind your own business. If she is gone, there was a reason, and it is none of your business.
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Dips$& that is the whole point of cafepharma. MH was let go bc of expenses.
     
  6. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    It's simple.....ex-Merck people in the VBU want more of their own so they'll find any excuse to get rid of those who aren't ex-Merck or who won't kiss their asses. No more Merck!
     
  7. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Why on earth did we buy NVD for over $5 billion?
     
  8. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Morons for leaders
     
  9. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    You didn't really. Look at the whole deal. Novartis paid GSK $16B for an oncology division worth only $10B then you turn around and pay them $7B for NVD that is only worth $1B. It was a face saving way for Novartis to get out of the vaccines business. You will digest the business and get rid of the bones in a few years and there will be nothing left but a few new vaccines in your portfolio and some residual IP.

    Just look at the thread on this subject over in Novartis' Cafe Pharma.
     
  10. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Saving face isn't worth all of the disruption caused by the integration.
     
  11. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    What's in it for GSK to help NVS with saving face?
     
  12. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Nothing, the face saving is for Novartis. Getting $16B for an oncology unit that by all normal business practices is worth $10B and Vaccines for free is.
     
  13. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Yeah but watch our stock tumble when we're held accountable by Wall Street to make Menveo/Bexsero profitable to justify the $7B price sham.
     
  14. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Everyone, especially WS, knows that we didn't "pay $7B" for Novartis Vaccines. Novartis paid us $16B for our Oncology division that standard valuation techniques says is worth $10B (10 times yearly earnings). In return GSK paid Novartis $7B for Vaccines.

    So, net net, we got Vaccines for $1B. And there are almost none of the costs that they are carrying that we need to keep in the medium term. This is a pure product / IP play and any extra costs carried over from the acquisition will be quickly eliminated.

    Brilliant move by our leadership.
     
  15. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Time will tell
     
  16. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Yeah the move might be brilliant as long as there isn't a whistleblower about all of NVD's shady marketing practices.
     
  17. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest


    Completely product/IP play. One way to make the Novartis money loser of a division profitable quickly? By the product/IP, retain essential Novartis personnel (less than 20%) and slash everything else. No way we retain all of the resources transferring over.

    Agree. Good move for GSK.
     
  18. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Thanks for responding to your own post.
     
  19. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Thanks for responding to your own post. Wait, I already said that.
     
  20. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    NVS here hey dumb asses wait till you find out what you actually bought. wanna buy some beachfront property in Iowa too?