Quad device

Discussion in 'Boston Scientific' started by Anonymous, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:44 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest


  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Lmao!!! Same here. Stj in big trouble.
     
  4. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    The bottom of the article reads "The Wall Street Journal news department was not involved in the creation of this content." Self promotion, you will never be as good as STJ.
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    It is called a press release Einstein.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20140324-903627.html?mod=WSJ_qtpressrel_pressrel

    Kind of like this one announcing a new HV lead, to improve a lead that isn't really failing but could be improved anyway.......nothing to see here folks. Move along.
     
  6. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Seriously, how did you make it through grade school?
     
  7. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    No way is Stj going to sell Quad Leads without a can.
     
  8. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    That will be a bad decision
     
  9. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    A 'new' lead? That is laughable. It is based off of an old Ventritex lead just with the Optim 'lubricious' coating on it.
     
  10. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    100% wrong.
     
  11. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest


    The lead is worth more than your can in which the header will ultimately fall off
     
  12. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    It is a hell of a lot easier to replace a can than a defective lead that has grown into the tissue.

    Plus your "falling off header" reply is getting a bit old school tiresome.
     
  13. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Quad can is gonna rock. Unbelievable reception it is getting.
     
  14. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    This is the same guy leading the cheers on the SICD thread. The notion that ANY physician is EXCITED about anything in CRM is laughable.