What happened to the Viagra thread

Discussion in 'Pfizer' started by Anonymous, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:24 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    It was starting to get interesting....to bad it's gone. I guess some people are a little prudish. It was a welcome relief to all the bitching that normally goes on here.
     

  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    I agree. It was an interesting read on people's lives.
     
  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Americans are prudish about sex but when it comes to guns we can't get enough!
     
  4. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    All this crap does is re-enforce the attitude that sex is supposed to stay in the closet. As someone stated, take a look around. Every person you see has either HAD sex or is here BECAUSE of it. But let's don't talk about it.

    Who would have thunk that television would be our liberators with shows like Game of Thrones, Masters of Sex and The Affair?
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    The ad is sexist. Obviously it's geared toward men and meant to titillate them to have the confidence to have sex with a beautiful young seductress. Too bad that a drug that was created to enhance sexual experience must be confined to that demographic. I'll bet many more creative uses outnumber the older man with ED being able to screw his fantasy younger woman. Young men take it. It's ridiculous. The thread was very entertaining. There have been tpoics more racy than this here.
     
  6. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    I'm almost 70. My sexy fantasy woman (and regular partner) is 65. We both find the ad sexy and that lies in the eyes of the beholder.

    Try this one...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7lcc62nrl9Y
     
  7. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    It was getting too hard to handle.
     
  8. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    I think the new ad campaign is brilliant! Blond haired, contacts that look like Viagra pills, sexy british accent talking about sex will push more pills.

    It's rather obvious that Pfizer, since losing Celebrex, will put more drive on the sales force to sell more Viagra and Chantix. We are seeing increases in these commercials and corporate must be spending a FORTUNE in advertising. Good Call!

    Next thing you know, managers will be hiring long hair, blue eyed girls with British accents to sell Viagra and Chantix. It's already interesting to note many current reps who sell Viagra have blonde hair, blue eyes.
     
  9. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    LOL- The thread was hardly here before it taken off.
     
  10. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Now that's creative partnering! I don't think this commercial would air in this country though studies show that laughter and playfulness are usually more of a turn on as a prelude to sex for women than hard core. Europeans are so ahead of us in their attitudes toward sex.
     
  11. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Of course its sexist. Only men get erections. We could also say advertisements for products for women's health are sexist. It kind of goes with the territory.
     
  12. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    This argument doesn't make sense. Woman's health products are about women's health, not their sexual dysfunction. Who says women don't get erections? Did you ever study the anatomy of a woman who is about to climax? Why doesn't Pfizer develop a little pill that can send more blood flow to that area of a woman's body to enhance HER experience? Then a commercial can be made about her fantasizing about a sexy guy.
     
  13. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Erectile Dysfunction IS about men's health. Sexual dysfunction IS a health issue for god's sake. Are you out of your mind? What classes teach reproduction? HEALTH classes.

    Yes, I've studied women about to climax. Also studies of Viagra in women in other countries have been run - notably Brazil. They were inconclusive. Many OBGs Rxd Viagra at first off label - ENTIRELY on their own figuring cliteral engorgement might parallel penile engorgement of the Corpus cavernosum. Whatever happened didn't translate into female sexual arousal. Do you honestly for a minute think that if there were promise for a female indication that these companies wouldn't be all over it? Get real. The ads would be even better too.
     
  14. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Not to mention the profits!
     
  15. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    They could make it a little pink pill! Curious as to the research that has gone into a woman's inability to have an orgasm due to not enough engorgement. I think that is written off as being psychological issues. It would be interesting.
     
  16. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Do people know how Viagra was discovered? Scientists weren't 'looking for an ED pill, they were researching sildenafil as a treatment for PAH and hypertension in general. When it was noted that make study subjects reported increased erections, the discovery was made.
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/2008/03/24/discovered-by-accident-viagra-still-popular-10-years-later/
    As noted, the pill has improved the sex life of both make AND females.
     
  17. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    There are commercials for women's sex life after menopause-I think the product is called Ophena. PVC also targets "painful sexual intercourse" so the ads are out there. Not about orgasms but they are out there.
     
  18. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Viagra ads aren't about an orgasm either. They're about achieving and maintaining an erection that will lead to successful penetration. If penetration occurs then BOTH mail and female have a chance for orgasm. Nothing is guaranteed though for either partner.

    The factors leading to arousal are much more complex in the female than in the male. Erection is just one part of the issue. It sure is weird that people have such a hard-
    on for Viagra.
     
  19. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Some people-if they aren't bitching about something , they ain't happy.