Allergan to pay $4 million to settle discrimination charges by former sales reps

Discussion in 'Pharma/Biotech Companies - In the News' started by cafead, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:32 AM.

  1. #1 cafead, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:32 AM
    cafead

    cafead Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2001
    Messages:
    32,925
    Likes Received:
    3
    Quote

  2. #2 anonymous, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:49 AM
    anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    “The women who filed the lawsuit — all of whom left Forest several years ago — charged that the drug maker deprived women of the same pay, bonuses, and promotions that were given to male employees, and also lowered internal rankings for women who took maternity leave. “Gender discrimination is Forest’s standard operating procedure rather than a sporadic occurrence,”
    Ain’t that the truth!! JL this lawsuit is a direct reflection of your cronyism and poor leadership. FRX the motel 6 of pharma!
     
    Quote
  3. #3 cafead, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:40 PM
    cafead

    cafead Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2001
    Messages:
    32,925
    Likes Received:
    3
    Unfortunately, although it was available earlier this morning, STAT has since put the article linked behind a paywall. You can also find some information on this Reuters article, and a link to the court case here.
     
    Quote
  4. #4 anonymous, Oct 10, 2017 at 9:37 PM
    anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    There was/is GENDER DISCRIMINATION in the LEGACY Allergan divisions!!!! The BOTOX Neuroscience division. No one contacted us - it's so bad!
     
    Quote
  5. #5 anonymous, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:50 PM
    anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Why is a staff member at cafe pharma posting this information?
     
    Quote
  6. #6 cafead, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:17 AM
    cafead

    cafead Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2001
    Messages:
    32,925
    Likes Received:
    3
    Cafepharma has always posted links to relevant news articles to its front page. We have recently begun feeding these links automatically to the message boards.

    In this particular Stat article, there was a publicly available link to a court document, which is why we shared it.
     
    Quote
Reply to Thread