Approved message? Fair balance?

Discussion in 'GlaxoSmithKline' started by anonymous, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:26 AM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I see a GSK SVP can post a link to NYTimes article on LinkedIn called No excuse people. Get the new shingles vaccine. Where is the fair balance, how does pass the sniff test? No other commentary given on the post, just a repeat of the headline.
     
  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    What ?
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Desbiens shared the NYT article on LinkedIn. If we did that or on Facebook, we would be fired!
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Perhaps there are two different sets of rules?
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Facts:
    • Current US SVP of GSK vaccines was also GM of Romania from January 2009 to September 2010
    • Reporting to him is marketing/commercial head of US Vaccines who was his successor in Romania as GM from Jan 2011 to Mar 2014
    • See article excerpts below
    Perhaps this helps you answer some of your questions or at least puts things into perspective.

    Reuters article reported July 29, 2015
    GSK faces new corruption allegations, this time in Romania
    "The latest allegations say GSK paid Romanian doctors hundreds, and in one cases thousands, of euros between 2009 and 2012 for prescribing its medicines, including prostate treatments Avodart and Duodart and Parkinson’s disease drug Requip.

    According to the email, the doctors were notionally paid for speaking engagements, but in three out of six cases, including the most highly paid one, they did not give any speech. The other three medics gave only one speech each, despite receiving multiple payments.

    GSK also provided doctors with many international trips and made payments to them under the guise of participation in advisory boards, the email said.

    The company said it would look “very thoroughly” into the claims, which cover a period before its pledge in December 2013 to stop paying doctors to speak on its behalf or to attend international conferences."
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    And this is a surprise? Really? No just a bad company run by bad people!
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Well if little Bobbie is unhappy and afraid of bad people, why doesn't he quit ?
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Defending the Child killers again?
     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    We are trying to keep you repeating that so the lawyers can find you. Keep it up Sparky.
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Ba low me! Your lawyer too.
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Poor English, maybe illiterate ? Do you mean " you're " , hahahahahaha ?
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Stop it you 2 clowns. If this is true it deserves serious attention.
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    .......................says the bottom feeding lawyer.
     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Nope. I'm a long time rep in the field with vested interest in the future of this company, you HR troll.
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    If you think we are harming people , you are in the wrong job and wrong company. Watch your language ,there are many watching you.