Biohaven Busy Work

Discussion in 'Biohaven' started by anonymous, Mar 25, 2020 at 7:24 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I saw the commercial last night. Fake news.
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    But it’s not fake news that we have way too many reps.
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    Kicking ass!! That’s what we’re doing
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    that was always the plan. Launch big, try to circumvent current habits of migraine specialists by bombarding the next tier down and then cut back when it made sense.

    this lockdown just changes the strategy and the pace.
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    “This drug is going to change the market” Seriously? Every single company that comes out with some pricey new drug says this. “Oh, it’s a game changer!!” and “This drug is going to change the treatment of XYZ disease state!!” You need to put down the Kool Aid and get real. It’s not going to change anything. Docs will keep reaching for generics because that’s what they are being told to do by managed care. Managed Care controls everything. It’s all about the bottom line. I don’t know what the future holds for the pharma industry. We need the innovation they bring to the treatment of disease. But it’s useless if doctors won’t write the drugs because they are expensive, require PA’s, and they get penalized by managed care for writing branded drugs.
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You make too much sense. If a company cannot get their drug onto large formularies at a reasonable price then sorry- not a good formula for success.
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    The new model is to give away the product for 6-9 months to drive clinical experience for providers and patients. Company can then license use to managed care companies.
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    our formulary success has been great - thanks Biohaven MC reps!!
     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Yeah, that’s what happens when you are willing to give up 50-60% GTN for a contract.

    all the more reason having the number of reps isn’t necessary or sustainable.
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    There are more drugs in the pipeline.
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    Yeah a lot of us came on board with this golden carrot dangled in front of us, but reality has now set in, and we realize that any approvals are a couple of years down the road. Plus no bipolar drug. Then the pandemic hit the week of launch, plus they’re giving away a huge portion of scripts with savings card. I don’t know how this company can sustain all of these reps. Don’t misunderstand me, I hope they can. But I really don’t know how it’s possible
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    None of which require this footprint.
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    look at it this way, we are carrying a $125-$145 Million field force cost.

    unless this drug does $1 billion, no CFO is going to let that slide for too long.
     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    There’s no reason to think we can’t eventually got to a billion with Nurtec. If each territory averages 200 patients per year on drug at a AWP of $850 per month, that’s $2 million per territory. If we have 300 territories, that’s $600 million. I’m not saying we get there this year, but it’s totally doable.
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    That's a high AWP for this product
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    OK, now throw in rebates of 40-50% to get any kind of payer coverage and you can cut your revenue in half.

    Not many migraine drugs out there that hit $1 billion.
     
  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Yep it was the migraine drug + the pipeline..
     
  18. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Stay calm and keep your jammies on.
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    How many Rxs are territories averaging?
     
  20. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    In our district 1-15 a week