Menu
Home
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
job listings
catering
whistleblower info
legal help
advertise on CP
submit press release
Menu
Log in
Sign up
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
More...
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
Covidien
>
COVIDIEN-NEW VENTILATOR
>
Reply to Thread
Name:
Verification:
Answer the above question:
(
CustomImgCaptcha
By
Surrey Forum
)
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 4870664"]You must work for the company or in a Level 3 center or regional hospital. * *In its current form the 980 is not a whole house vent. *</p><p><br /></p><p>I would rather unify with one vendor that can be used across the ENTIRE house than piecemeal to ensure consistency . *There is ZERO company data on PAV and the price that was discussed with our facility, before it was submitted to the FDA it seems, was ridiculously high for its capabilities. *How about having consistent user experience? Think about nurses and RTs that take call, people float between depts. *There is actual clinical risk if different vents are used in the facility. *Didn't a patient die peri procedure not too long ago because the crna was not familiar with a vent. *It was in the news. *</p><p><br /></p><p>Competition has better offerings for NICU PICU *and better integration into hospital systems. *Yes the 980 has a slick user int designed to make an RTs life easier but we don't have the influence we used to and it is not about us. *The question is what is best for our patients and who has the DATA to support evidence based practice which influences the value committee. **</p><p><br /></p><p>If I was an enterprising FDA or DOJ person, not being an expert on the rules for med device, *it seems like some rules were broken and some names were named for people responsible. Dont care how big a vendor is, no one should break rules in this industry and put patients at risk. *[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 4870664"]You must work for the company or in a Level 3 center or regional hospital. * *In its current form the 980 is not a whole house vent. * I would rather unify with one vendor that can be used across the ENTIRE house than piecemeal to ensure consistency . *There is ZERO company data on PAV and the price that was discussed with our facility, before it was submitted to the FDA it seems, was ridiculously high for its capabilities. *How about having consistent user experience? Think about nurses and RTs that take call, people float between depts. *There is actual clinical risk if different vents are used in the facility. *Didn't a patient die peri procedure not too long ago because the crna was not familiar with a vent. *It was in the news. * Competition has better offerings for NICU PICU *and better integration into hospital systems. *Yes the 980 has a slick user int designed to make an RTs life easier but we don't have the influence we used to and it is not about us. *The question is what is best for our patients and who has the DATA to support evidence based practice which influences the value committee. ** If I was an enterprising FDA or DOJ person, not being an expert on the rules for med device, *it seems like some rules were broken and some names were named for people responsible. Dont care how big a vendor is, no one should break rules in this industry and put patients at risk. *[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
Covidien
>
COVIDIEN-NEW VENTILATOR
>
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
Covidien
>
COVIDIEN-NEW VENTILATOR
>