Do they know what Stark is?

Discussion in 'PathGroup' started by anonymous, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:31 AM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    How can pathgroup not track expenses for doctors? I thought Stark applied to them. it applies to everyone else.
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Expenses? Sounds like an Anti-Kickback Statute issue.
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    the company does not track expenses to doctors. Sales folks playing golf with doctors?
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You are misinformed. PathGroup tracks the same expense data as any other company. I know for a fact because I go through the painstaking process of looking up and attaching the NPI's.

    Nothing to see here. Move along and whine about something else.
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You are wrong. Home office girls do it.
    Many doctors are over the $400 limit--illegal
    Many folks play golf with doctors including mgmt.--illegal
    Nothing is tracked--illegal
    Many client are offered specials on client bill thin preps over other groups---illegal

    I think Stark and Gov't would not be happy
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    The reps submit the NPI data but its not tracked. Ive spent over $1000 a year on certain docs in my 5 yrs and nobodys ever said anything about it.

    Reps use their own CC, so even if pathgroup was investigated it would be impossible to prove.
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    They should be reported. Sounds like bribing.
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    Bribing with an office lunch? Seriously??

    I don’t have a dog in the hunt and I have to say that line of thinking sounds a little far-fetched and desperate.
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    you sound as clueless as mgmt.
    There are limits with Stark and lunches. Inducement ding dong.
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Painstaking?

    Google search, copy and paste. Dummy.

    Doesnt even have to be the right npi
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    True
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Misleading CMS and the gov't is in violation of Starke. Using wrong NPI is a abuse.
    CMS should be alerted.
     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    If you are losing to pathgroup because they did a lunch you have bigger problems to be concerned with.
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    management avoiding another issue.
    Alert FDA asap
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    even using our own CC, we still expense the charges with receipts. it'll come back to us at some point.
     
  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    wht about offering billing software to offices to enhance their client billing? that sounds real legit
     
  18. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You're dumb.

    It's built into PathGroups software.

    Dumb idiot.
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    But if we give software to the client or allow a client to utilize it, that's the definition of inducement, right?
     
  20. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Nothing is “given to” the client. A software program (that the client has no access to) processes data that the client submits with all accessions. It’s really pretty simple.

    It feels good to win, man!