DOJ and VA Atty General Interviews

Discussion in 'Indivior' started by Anonymous, May 18, 2015 at 7:49 AM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    any real news on the investigations? Been over 3 years now for the first round, I would have to think this concludes this year? The people who have been pointed out have to be over this hanging over their heads all this time.
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    Seems like a lot of people involved are already gone ?
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    True, and Ed was one of the first ones out
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Dr Ed had nothing to do with it, nor did most of the company. Yahoo's in TN and close by were the problem and most of them are still around dragging down moral.
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    ??? Dragging down morale
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Yes, those Yahoo's were responsible for the citizens petition and ALL alleged anti-trust activities in Richmond. I heard those CL's actually commuted to the home office every night and secretly designed questionable marketing pieces that drew the attention of the State Attorney General in Virginia. True, its just a smokescreen that 40 states are suing us because of the alleged monopoly created not in Richmond but, yes, TN and surrounding areas. I heard the citizens petition that was filed that delayed the entry of generics didn't come from RB attorneys, thats right, the Yahoo's in TN got together one day and wrote that all by themselves! Thanks for pointing out this egregious act as these dangerous people need to be stopped immediately!
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    Great post response to morons that still think TN KY NC GA were the responsible parties. The geniuses were and always have been home office and ABMs
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    It always seemed that the states you mentioned were always the Pinnacle award members until after the fact
     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    NC and GA were not involved.
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    I do believe the reps from there were interviewed and rather vigorously
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    IT WAS BOTH - indictments looming. Pay attention pioneers
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    he was forced out
    Indictments still looming
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    no hate in heart just know who she stabbed and some if the unscrupulous behavior that probably helped get her there.
     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Are you the one no longer on that team for obvious reasons??!!
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    ???? Not sure who you are referring.....current employee not on her team
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    who the heck is the pioneer guy? Seems like a r***** but oh well. Seems to me that all the main players are still here and nothing after over three years of searching. Seems like much to do about nothing. If they haven't found anything that sticks by now they aren't going to.
     
  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    yeah well thats not how it works. Case is still unfolding by DOJ
     
  18. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    How's it going for you guys? When they going to shut the doors ?
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    sooner not later......sub block aid sales suck balls...........
     
  20. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    we are toast as this is heating up again...drug hopping and lying to doctors is bad...

    toast...

    44. Reckitt also directed its sales force to tell doctors that the film was more difficult than the tablets for patients or others to abuse by crushing and then ingesting in order to “get high.” This, too, was a complete falsehood. As alleged above, Suboxone film is far easier than the tablets for patients or others to dissolve and inappropriately inject or otherwise ingest. The truth is exactly the opposite of the message that Reckitt incessantly broadcast to doctors and other industry participants. The film strips, not the tablets, are more prone to abuse.


    45. In September 2012, Reckitt issued a press release falsely advising the public and doctors that Reckitt intended to withdraw the tablets from the market within the next six months due to the “pediatric exposure safety issue.” Reckitt instructed its sales force to deliver the same fraudulent message to doctors and other industry participants, asserting that Reckitt would imminently withdraw the tablets from the market due to child-safety concerns. In fact, the FDA determined that there was no evidence that the tablets “were, or should have been, withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety.” Determination that SUBOXONE (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride and Naloxone Hydrochloride) Sublingual Tablets, 2 Milligrams/0.5 Milligrams and 8 Milligrams/2 Milligrams, Were Not Withdrawn From Sale For Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness, 78 FR 34108 (June 6, 2013). Reckitt’s real and sole purpose in announcing the imminent withdrawal of the tablets from the market was to further coerce doctors to switch their prescriptions and prescribing habits from the tablets to the film.