1. Happy Thanksgiving from Cafepharma! Our news staff will be off on Thursday, and will be feeding news on a limited basis throughout the holiday weekend. CP Today will return on Monday, November 30. We hope you enjoy this time, and stay safe! — See more on our front page news Stay updated with the latest pharma-related coronavirus news on our new page
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Please take our quick survey on how COVID-19 is impacting your job It will only take a minute or two to respond. The survey is confidential, and does not require registration. Thank you in advance for your participation. We will provide regular updates on results as responses accumulate.
    Dismiss Notice

Grand jury pending

Discussion in 'Millennium Laboratories' started by Anonymous, May 2, 2013 at 9:07 PM.

  1. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Look for an announcement soon.
     
  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Love how you keep referring to the "Massachusetts" investigation in your filing. It is not a Massachusetts investigation, it is a Federal OIG investigation, taking place in Boston.

    http://pathologyblawg.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/ML-vs.-Ameritox.pdf

    Any particular reason you chose to file your lawsuit in Boston too? Methinks you are trying to drag Ameritox into your Federal troubles. Doubt it will work...
     
  4. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Ameritox is going down as well...count on that
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Any movement?
     
  6. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Uh, oh!!! Looks like some docs and treatment centers are going down for overuse of point of care cups and billing too. 36 million coming back to BC/BS of New Jersey, I'll wager:

    http://floridahealthcarelawfirmblog...-avee-attacks-point-of-care-testing/#more-943

    "The case is very instructive because imbedded in it are compliance related suggestions, some of which may not be apparent to many healthcare service providers, like:

    Confirmatory testing of negative POCT results requires the healthcare provider has documented clinical reasons to believe the negative POCT was inaccurate or inconclusive.

    Clinical labs must have a compliance program to detect and prevent healthcare providers from performing unnecessary POCT and ordering unnecessary confirmatory testing.

    A clinical lab may not offer below market value POCT tests and consulting agreements in order to induce healthcare providers to refer tests.

    Labs may not waive patient financial responsibility to induce healthcare providers to refer urine specimens to the lab."
     
  7. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    http://floridahealthcarelawfirmblog...-avee-attacks-point-of-care-testing/#more-943
     
  8. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    No matter what I would still rather work here than PCLS. That place has gone completely down the drain. It was garbage and is now even worse.
     
  9. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Ah…somebody clearly didn't perform after a year and was let go. So sad for you. You're pathetic