Importance of 3 Decades of Climate Data

Discussion in 'Political Discussions' started by ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:46 AM.

  1. #1 ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:46 AM
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 3, 2011 at 11:08 AM
    ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

    ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    17
    For the cp libtard jihadists, facts are so bewildering...

    As they review the bizarre and unpredictable weather pattern of the past several years, a growing number of scientists are beginning to suspect that many seemingly contradictory meteorological fluctuations are actually part of a global climatic upheaval. However widely the weather varies from place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age.

    Telltale signs are everywhere — from the unexpected persistence and thickness of pack ice in the waters around Iceland to the southward migration of a warmth-loving creature like the armadillo from the Midwest.Since the 1940s the mean global temperature has dropped about 2.7° F. Although that figure is at best an estimate, it is supported by other convincing data. When Climatologist George J. Kukla of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory and his wife Helena analyzed satellite weather data for the Northern Hemisphere, they found that the area of the ice and snow cover had suddenly increased by 12% in 1971 and the increase has persisted ever since. Areas of Baffin Island in the Canadian Arctic, for example, were once totally free of any snow in summer; now they are covered year round.


    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,944914,00.html#ixzz19zFK8diJ

    Indeed, the little minds of the climate jihadists suffer a mental whiplash with every little climatological whim.

    .
     

  2. ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

    ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    17
    23 views and Brokeback hasn't chimed to validate this 30+ years of climate work. That seems to be the libtard AGW jihadist qualifier...30 years of data.

    Go figure. Very chilling!
     
  3. Breakingnews

    Breakingnews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    9,598
    Likes Received:
    54
    You run an article out there from 1974 and expect to be taken seriously?

    Try coming into the present with 'climate work' that is FACT:


    http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/

    You make this almost two easy.

    34 consecutive years and counting, twink.
     
  4. ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

    ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    17
    So what you are saying is that the only research that matters is the research that supports your ruse? Got it.

    In another 34 years people will look upon the libtard AGW jihadists as a bunch of chicken little idiots. All the while Algore gains more and more weight at his California beach front home and laughs about how he deluded you into thinking the seas would consume the coastlines. Oh, Hockeysticks!

    CLUE: Still waiting for a working telephone number for Algore's carbon credit exchange. You do have it don't you?
     
  5. Breakingnews

    Breakingnews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    9,598
    Likes Received:
    54
    I'ts 2011, not 1974 . . .You got shanked and your above response is nothing more than another concession on your part. As far as the 'only reserch that matters' issue . . . Surely you jest - You and the other climate denier bitches here only see the research and data that you think supports your ever melting position on AGW.

    CLUE: You need to get one.

     
  6. ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

    ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    17
    So by your standards, any research that was done prior to that which you support is invalid? Really?

    Got that CCX telephone number?
     
  7. Breakingnews

    Breakingnews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    9,598
    Likes Received:
    54
    Your concession was already accepted.

    Make sure to change your calender from 1974.
     
  8. ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

    ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ha!. You're the lowest common denominator libtard jihadist.
     
  9. D_A_R_T_H

    D_A_R_T_H Guest

    Where is the authors name to this article, for all we know this is 40 y/o misinformation by an oil exec trying to hid the reality of AGW. In any case this is old old news and the technology and methods have improved vastly since then.
     
  10. Breakingnews

    Breakingnews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    9,598
    Likes Received:
    54
    Just more smoke and mirrors from 4DVile, the CP face of tourettes. He has no game and just took another hard fastball to the temple.
     
  11. ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

    ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    17
    So, according to you, any data prior to the date you want is invalid? That's what passes for research in the libtard nation? At that time there was no AGW ruse going on, so there was no AGW bullshit to cover up.

    At least you show some curiosity to an opposing view. If you take time to read the article, you'll see that it quotes numerous experts including Donald Oilman, chief of the National Weather Service's long-range-prediction group and George J. Kukla of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory.

    One important point that libtard jihadists can't recon with is this:
    The earth's current climate is something of an anomaly; in the past 700,000 years, there have been at least seven major episodes of glaciers spreading over much of the planet.

    But, libtard jihadist want to make a big deal out of hockeystick hoaxes and a 34 blip. You see, AGW is the perfect political (and it is purely political) issue, because everyone should be concerned about mother earth and "experts" and politicians can say what they want now and never be accountable at anytime in the lifetimes of anyone living today. It's perfect. Way to go Algore!

    BTW, do you have that working phone number for Algore's CCX? I've made up some carbon credits that I really want to sell to some libtard jihadist.
     
  12. D_A_R_T_H

    D_A_R_T_H Guest

    What does any of this have to do with Al Gore, he's just a guy who made a movie about it. You insert Gores name to make a political matter of it, this is not political to me. Your article is invlalid becaus there is no author or sources to support the information it provides. Besides its one article from 35 years ago who cares?
     
  13. Amazingly, Libtards always try to claim the high ground when it comes to "science."

    Well here is the issue.

    Whether one side is right or wrong, the point is, there ARE two sides. There is no conclusive, 100% certain evidence, with reproducible results that prove the theory of AGW. In fact, it is impossible to actually conduct such an experiment.

    For example, the "theory of gravity." I can drop a ball from head height, and it will ALWAYS drop, at the same speed. No matter who drops this ball.

    This cannot be said for AGW.

    So the fact that there are MANY discrepancies with the AGW theory shows that it is in fact NOT settled science. In fact, science is never settled. That is what makes it science.

    The only things that are "settled" are faith based religious endeavors. Which is why this is so hilarious. Libtards who would never claim that something is "normal" or "natural" suddenly go ape shit when it comes to climate, as if there is a "normal" climate and use words like, "do you believe in global warming..." as if it is some cult.
     
  14. ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng

    ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    17
    AGW is indeed a cult. A cult conjured up for political gain of libtard nation. The members of this cult are no different in their zealous myopia than muslim jihadists. The only difference is there could never be 72 virgin libtards to await each them.

    In the minds of libtard jihadists, there is only one science...the science that supports their religion. Witness their above unwillingness/inability to examine seriously the views of scientists a mere 30 years ago. All they know is what their profiteers of AGW tell them. They are the virtual Jonestown of libtard nation. Unfortunately, an important part of their bible has been shredded (or, excuse me, "lost") by their prophets (or...profiteers).

    CCX, anyone?
     
  15. Breakingnews

    Breakingnews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    9,598
    Likes Received:
    54
    Go easy on 4DVile - He is the runt of the litter.
     
  16. jasmin

    jasmin Guest

    Well, assuming you're standing on the surface of the Earth. :D

    Many so called proven scientific facts have later been altered or disproven. The proof here is the need to change the discussion from warming to 'change'. As I've said before, there should be little doubt that humans, just like cows and other creatures, affect their environment. However, there is no proof that this is to a greater degree than historic levels, that it is detirmental, that we can or should try to change it. AGW is an attempt at world socialism. Every proposal puts developed nations at a negative position, supporting developing nations. Every one destroys the economy of the US. Taken to extreme, the only way this will be controlled is if we turn back our progress by decades, quit driving and flying, and change our lives back to an agrarian society. AGW extremists carry it further, wanting to restrict family size too. Somehow I don't think we're going there so will not passively agree to the government finding one more way to charge me for living that does absolutely no good.

    When I was growing up, we used to laugh about that someone, someday, would try to sell air. Well, here we are. Carbon credits anyone?!? How stupid are people to buy this bill of goods?
     
  17. Breakingnews

    Breakingnews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    9,598
    Likes Received:
    54
    Excellent summary of the daily FOX News talking points as regards to AGW as ordered by the 'boss'.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/15/fox-news-climate-change-email_n_796963.html

    Right up your alley.
     
  18. jasmin

    jasmin Guest

    So Fox created all the skepticism, attacks on scientists with a different view, and the years if discussion. Wow, they really are all powerful. :eek::eek:
     
  19. Breakingnews

    Breakingnews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    9,598
    Likes Received:
    54
    They sure have alot of power over the likes of you and the majority of ConClown posters here on CP.

    FOX decieves, you believe.
     
  20. As Mark Levin said the other day on the radio, we need to join him in promoting CO2.

    More plants = more food.

    More plants = more oxygen.

    Warmer temps = increase in bio-divuuuuuursity.

    Let's join together and promote CO2 as the life giving gas that it is.

    :)