Minerva vs NovaSure

Ha, ha!

First quote that caught my eye when googling Sophocles:

I would prefer even to fail with honor than win by cheating

 

Friday schedule of an old ablation rep:

7:00am show up at Myosure cases of doctors that switched to Minerva. Tell them they are taking food off my table and that every Minerva they use they will have a spell cast on them.

8:00am tell administrator that I am upset about their decision to use better technology. Threaten price increase and hand out head to head studies. Bully doctors, leave.

9:00am- 3:00pm medreps applications. S follow up interview calls

3:00pm-call schedulers to find out which cases I lost.

Repeat each week.

 

Dear ex-Stryker meatball,
That person you responded to had one of the more insightful posts in this 6 page thread. As usual, you respond with something of no value. Glad you take time out of your day to do something meaningless.

 

It had meaning to dismiss your idiotic post, rambling on and on about stuff you don’t know.

Shoooosh...

QUOTE="anonymous, post: 6047098"]Dear ex-Stryker meatball,
That person you responded to had one of the more insightful posts in this 6 page thread. As usual, you respond with something of no value. Glad you take time out of your day to do something meaningless.[/QUOTE]j

 

This is EVERYTHING lol

 

j[/QUOTE]

LOL; I didn't post the initial post that I was defending, but I probably know quite a bit more about your division than you think. No wonder this division is in the tank with people like you on the team. First, it was the reps and managers with your same attitude who saw no need for national accounts for all those years... until competition came out and then you all panicked and literally begged NA for help structuring contracts that would minimize the competitive threat. Next, remember when TO', WP and all of the RBD's (most of which are gone now) had to figure out how to handle HPG? You probably weren't part of those meetings. That was a good one... how's it turning out? And let's not forget about the entire situation in the OH/KY area. Fast forward to now, and you've turned over the vast majority of your sales and general leadership, alienated your best reps, changed your comp plan for the worse, embraced high turnover, and hired or retained meatballs like you. Want me to keep going or do you think I know more than you thought about what's happening behind the curtain?

Maybe new leadership is right. You don't have to hire clinically-astute reps. Maybe the reps are providing very little value in this market. Who needs to have good reps and pay them well if you have a good clinical support team and national accounts structuring the right types of agreements? It's a shame for all of the great reps that were there or are still there and just looking to get out. Management/leadership has told you what the job is...but you aren't listening. Ouch.

 

j[/QUOTE]

NovaSure down 15% in Q2 ... How long have you and the 'A-Team' who have slapped a Hologic sticker over the old Stryker logo on your high-fivin' bro-van got to turn it around?

Seems to be going from bad to worse for you guys.

Tick-tock my friends ...

 

if anyone needs a “Regional Leader” in PA,NJ,DE, Mutt Lytle is available.

 

NovaSure down 15% in Q2 ... How long have you and the 'A-Team' who have slapped a Hologic sticker over the old Stryker logo on your high-fivin' bro-van got to turn it around?

Seems to be going from bad to worse for you guys.

Tick-tock my friends ...[/QUOTE]


Lol... I wonder what the A would stand for...

Arrogance? Attrition? I bet pretty soon it’s gonna stand for Accountability....

 

OMG this is the best!

 

LOL; I didn't post the initial post that I was defending, but I probably know quite a bit more about your division than you think. No wonder this division is in the tank with people like you on the team. First, it was the reps and managers with your same attitude who saw no need for national accounts for all those years... until competition came out and then you all panicked and literally begged NA for help structuring contracts that would minimize the competitive threat. Next, remember when TO', WP and all of the RBD's (most of which are gone now) had to figure out how to handle HPG? You probably weren't part of those meetings. That was a good one... how's it turning out? And let's not forget about the entire situation in the OH/KY area. Fast forward to now, and you've turned over the vast majority of your sales and general leadership, alienated your best reps, changed your comp plan for the worse, embraced high turnover, and hired or retained meatballs like you. Want me to keep going or do you think I know more than you thought about what's happening behind the curtain?

Maybe new leadership is right. You don't have to hire clinically-astute reps. Maybe the reps are providing very little value in this market. Who needs to have good reps and pay them well if you have a good clinical support team and national accounts structuring the right types of agreements? It's a shame for all of the great reps that were there or are still there and just looking to get out. Management/leadership has told you what the job is...but you aren't listening. Ouch.[/QUOTE]

Not surprising that the CP troll/ex-SYK meat head never responded to this. He has been properly put in place by someone who actually knows the division.

 

Not surprising that the CP troll/ex-SYK meat head never responded to this. He has been properly put in place by someone who actually knows the division.[/QUOTE]

 

[/QUOTE]

 

Suck it Clapper. Dove tired of your nonsense--it just kept getting pettier as you failed again and became more desperate. And now you get to make yourself look like the moron that you are, in a public exchange. However, I suggest you have some actual tangible evidence for your allegations, all of which have been blown out of the water during an extensive investigation of every one of your complaints and bs allegations by Dove Press.

Retraction? Hah, hah, hah, haha!

Idiot

 

"The real issue is the Hologic then changed the study, which the original submission described how the 2-3 month post procedure bleeding scores were known at the time of enrollment, by removing this information and then stating that "No subject's post-procedure bleeding status was reviewed, queried, nor known at enrollment, in either study arm." They realized no one would publish it the previous way, and lied, misled, what ever you want to call it, in order to get their headlines.

They did not anticipate the original study submission to be in the hands of people who have the balls to stand up and call them out finally on their bullshit."

Now here's where you're fucked: the study, and the cohort, never changed. Their first report (go ahead and put it online so you have another lawsuit) contains the exact same enrollment criteria, primary efficacy outcome (amenorrhea at or beyond,not before, minimum of 3M follow-up), and no women's results were ever omitted in the paper's evolution. Jackass. This was basically a patient-reported satisfaction report, but early drafts contained limited physician-charted "bleeding status" data--because only 2/3 or women returned for follow-up at a median of <30 days post-procedure, and less than half of them had any bleeding status recorded (this was a "hey, how're you feeling" visit), the data was of limited utility or meaningfulness. The authors appreciated that valid reviewer comment, so those incomplete data were omitted and this was patient-only. The EXACT same cohort, without a single omission, but it's a survey so it had a 100% response (not participation) rate.

Asswipe Clapper's trying to distort reality saying that the cohort changed after (less than half) of women's "2-3 month" bleeding status was used to select subjects. That is a joke. And that is precisely why Dove Press/Taylor Francis parent company--both of their legal teams--are laughing at your pathetic efforts to denigrate a solid study. Limitations? Yes, of course, like any study (e.g., using heme alkaline assay to confirm amenorrhea--doesn't work; not anymore). But the facts are the facts, whether you like them or not.

Otherwise your frantic efforts would have resulted in that paper being retracted instead of simply delayed by your nonsense.

Now we will argue in Letters-to-the-editor, which I'm drooling waiting for because I'm going to tear you a new asshole.

You are a lying, deceitful man who tried to denigrate completely the reputations of 4 excellent surgeons, and good men (collateral damage to you, asswipe), and it's didn't work.

Your ruse was exposed and you are pathetic.

You don't matter anymore.

 

Can you say “bitch slap” in Cafe Pharma because that’s what just happened in the reply above. Minerva’s desperate attempt was beyond hilarious!! Reps will be lining up to exit that single digit market share company. Bye bye now Mr Clapper and team. Maybe Eugene should schedule more dinner programs because that always worked.

 

Fair dues if your position is vindicated, but as Hologic is a company specialising in Women's Health, it seems a bit off-kilter responding as if you are at an UFC/MMA press conference?

 

It seems like the over agressive bully on here is actually some sort of management type at Hologic, trying to justify the disgusting acts of the company by further lying about the facts. It’s almost as if the sales force is pushing back on this bogus data, and this messaging is for them. FOLKS THEY ARE LYING TO YOU. My god, what a toxic culture.

Explain again why JMIG and American Journal of Gynecology rejected the study? because they claim potential patient bias and numerous ethics violations. The explanation I’ve heard before is some sort of conspiracy theory against Hologic? Meanwhile, every piece of legitimate data produced by reputable journals or the FDA shows statistical significance in terms of the benefits of Minerva over Novasure (or any of the other ablation devices created before the year 2000). This Dove Press garbage dumpster fire retrospective survey (which all doctors know is an absolute joke of a method for conducting a study) is the only “publication” which shows the opposite to be true. Compound that with new reps without relationships, or without any idea what they are actually talking about for that matter, running around blindly with this thing. I predict significant damage to the brand.

There will be significant fall out for the way Hologic management is conducting themselves in this market. The FDA is on to them and it is only a matter of time before the hammer falls. And that will be a good day.

 

A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SUBMISSION HAS BEEN CIRCULATING AND IT ABSOLUTLY IS CHANGED. Who do you think you are fooling? Why are you continuing to blatantly lie? It’s such an easy thing to disprove.

This is truly an unbelievable display of disgraceful business ethics.

 

This post is a perfect example of misdirection by a group of people whose posts are entirely full of assumptions only, and any intelligent reader knows this. Trying to persuade readers by commenting on what you "think" is true and making suggestive comments on what other people think, is a testament to your ignorance and those around you. The fall out will be yours, keep posting you are only helping yourself look foolish.