Menu
Home
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
job listings
catering
whistleblower info
legal help
advertise on CP
submit press release
Menu
Log in
Sign up
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
More...
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
General Discussion
>
Political Discussions
>
Obama and the New Party
>
Reply to Thread
Name:
Verification:
Answer the above question:
(
CustomImgCaptcha
By
Surrey Forum
)
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="jasmin, post: 4394231"]<i>The term has so many associations and has been used to describe so many divergent political and economic approaches that the only meaning sure to garner consensus is an assertive statism applied in the larger cause of “equality,” usually through redistributive economic policies that involve a bias toward taking an intrusive and domineering role in the workings of the private sector. One might also apply another yardstick: an ambivalence, even antipathy, for democracy when democracy proves inconvenient.1 With this understanding as a vague guideline, the answer is certainly, Yes, Obama’s agenda is socialist in a broad sense. </i><a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/what-kind-of-socialist-is-barack-obama/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/what-kind-of-socialist-is-barack-obama/" rel="nofollow">http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/what-kind-of-socialist-is-barack-obama/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Wealth distribution</p><p>Obamacare and further government takeover of healthcare</p><p>Nationalization and government ownership of GM</p><p>Wage controls on bank workers</p><p>Establishing federal government as sole source of student loans</p><p>Government run and driven economy</p><p>Collectivism</p><p>Social justice</p><p>Increasing progressive taxation</p><p>Fairness defined not as equal opportunity but equal benefit regardless of work[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="jasmin, post: 4394231"][I]The term has so many associations and has been used to describe so many divergent political and economic approaches that the only meaning sure to garner consensus is an assertive statism applied in the larger cause of “equality,” usually through redistributive economic policies that involve a bias toward taking an intrusive and domineering role in the workings of the private sector. One might also apply another yardstick: an ambivalence, even antipathy, for democracy when democracy proves inconvenient.1 With this understanding as a vague guideline, the answer is certainly, Yes, Obama’s agenda is socialist in a broad sense. [/I][url]http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/what-kind-of-socialist-is-barack-obama/[/url] Wealth distribution Obamacare and further government takeover of healthcare Nationalization and government ownership of GM Wage controls on bank workers Establishing federal government as sole source of student loans Government run and driven economy Collectivism Social justice Increasing progressive taxation Fairness defined not as equal opportunity but equal benefit regardless of work[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
General Discussion
>
Political Discussions
>
Obama and the New Party
>
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
General Discussion
>
Political Discussions
>
Obama and the New Party
>