Menu
Home
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
job listings
catering
whistleblower info
legal help
advertise on CP
submit press release
Menu
Log in
Sign up
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
More...
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
Olympus
>
Olympus ENT
>
Reply to Thread
Name:
Verification:
Answer the above question:
(
CustomImgCaptcha
By
Surrey Forum
)
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 4874593"]In Japan, it is the sole wins of Olympus. </p><p>There is one reason. </p><p>In a common Japanese hospital, one endoscope system is used by the urology, surgery, orthopedics, otolaryngology, and common use.</p><p>Therefore, if a deputy director might be a surgeon, it would determine automatically by the liking. </p><p>Since Olympus is a Japanese company, it is the best at how to sell. </p><p><br /></p><p>Speaking individually, Olympus's breaking easily (heat weekness) and being hard to have it. </p><p>Image quality is standard and inferior to Karl-Storz. </p><p>Since Hi-Vision system has not been used, there is no qualification for my evaluating it. </p><p>Probably it is not needed at least by ENT. </p><p><br /></p><p>I am performing an operation independently now at my clinic. </p><p>I am using Linvatec (Conmed) IM3300 now. </p><p>Although brightness of image quality is lower than Karl-Storz, it is good in general. </p><p>I am very much pleased with the strongness (heat & physically) and easly to have it. </p><p><br /></p><p>But I would like to know evaluation of a striker988's image quality. </p><p>Would someone teach the comparative evaluation of IM3300 and 988?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 4874593"]In Japan, it is the sole wins of Olympus. There is one reason. In a common Japanese hospital, one endoscope system is used by the urology, surgery, orthopedics, otolaryngology, and common use. Therefore, if a deputy director might be a surgeon, it would determine automatically by the liking. Since Olympus is a Japanese company, it is the best at how to sell. Speaking individually, Olympus's breaking easily (heat weekness) and being hard to have it. Image quality is standard and inferior to Karl-Storz. Since Hi-Vision system has not been used, there is no qualification for my evaluating it. Probably it is not needed at least by ENT. I am performing an operation independently now at my clinic. I am using Linvatec (Conmed) IM3300 now. Although brightness of image quality is lower than Karl-Storz, it is good in general. I am very much pleased with the strongness (heat & physically) and easly to have it. But I would like to know evaluation of a striker988's image quality. Would someone teach the comparative evaluation of IM3300 and 988?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
Olympus
>
Olympus ENT
>
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
Olympus
>
Olympus ENT
>