Menu
Home
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
job listings
catering
whistleblower info
legal help
advertise on CP
submit press release
Menu
Log in
Sign up
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
More...
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
NuVasive
>
Osteocell Plus vs. Trinity Evolution
>
Reply to Thread
Name:
Verification:
Answer the above question:
(
CustomImgCaptcha
By
Surrey Forum
)
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Concerned Scientist, post: 3015850"]BMP is but one example of a product with clinical studies for the "betterment of the patients"</p><p><br /></p><p>The point is. Where are those same studies for Osteocel, etc.?</p><p><br /></p><p>Much has been learned over the years since the first launch of BMP (both with BMP-2 and BMP-7) and it has all been addressed in package insert updates and letters to the doctors. You raise good points. However, the clinician drives and decides what is best for his patients, correct? They also do their own clinical research as well. </p><p><br /></p><p>This discussion was merely using the big gorilla in the room as an example, I could have easily used Grafton as well. </p><p><br /></p><p>This still has not answered the same point from the beginning: where is the clinical efficacy of Osteocel and what is the proof of how a 250,000 MSC/cc claim can be physically possible in a human donor regardless of concentration steps. </p><p><br /></p><p>Going off on an example of a company who had to go through a decade of clinical and pre-clinical just to put the new product on the market is pointless. It just shows that you do not have an answer to the original question.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Concerned Scientist, post: 3015850"]BMP is but one example of a product with clinical studies for the "betterment of the patients" The point is. Where are those same studies for Osteocel, etc.? Much has been learned over the years since the first launch of BMP (both with BMP-2 and BMP-7) and it has all been addressed in package insert updates and letters to the doctors. You raise good points. However, the clinician drives and decides what is best for his patients, correct? They also do their own clinical research as well. This discussion was merely using the big gorilla in the room as an example, I could have easily used Grafton as well. This still has not answered the same point from the beginning: where is the clinical efficacy of Osteocel and what is the proof of how a 250,000 MSC/cc claim can be physically possible in a human donor regardless of concentration steps. Going off on an example of a company who had to go through a decade of clinical and pre-clinical just to put the new product on the market is pointless. It just shows that you do not have an answer to the original question.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
NuVasive
>
Osteocell Plus vs. Trinity Evolution
>
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
NuVasive
>
Osteocell Plus vs. Trinity Evolution
>