Menu
Home
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
job listings
catering
whistleblower info
legal help
advertise on CP
submit press release
Menu
Log in
Sign up
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
More...
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
NuVasive
>
Osteocell Plus vs. Trinity Evolution
>
Reply to Thread
Name:
Verification:
Answer the above question:
(
CustomImgCaptcha
By
Surrey Forum
)
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 3185327"]I guess you have to have clever marketing to sell a $4k plus product that has no clinical data to back it's claims. I agree with the original poster...although it was slightly redundant after a while. Talk to some reps and ask them if they would have this stuff put inside them...Half of them don't even want the spinal hardware they sling implanted in themselves either. How do I know I'm not getting Joe Blow a 75 year old smoker implanted in me along with a plethora of other donors in the same batch. It is a cadaveric based product. If I am going to have surgery, I'd much rather use my own cells....at least I know where I've been! Lastly for the poster that mentioned the unfunded study and how the MSC's must be doing something because it's better than allograft...that's not saying much! Autograft is still the gold standard in most folks eyes and there are only 2 products on the market that have shown equivalence to autograft in prospective, peer-reviewed, Level 1, published clinical trials and I can assure you Osteocel and Trinity are not the 2.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 3185327"]I guess you have to have clever marketing to sell a $4k plus product that has no clinical data to back it's claims. I agree with the original poster...although it was slightly redundant after a while. Talk to some reps and ask them if they would have this stuff put inside them...Half of them don't even want the spinal hardware they sling implanted in themselves either. How do I know I'm not getting Joe Blow a 75 year old smoker implanted in me along with a plethora of other donors in the same batch. It is a cadaveric based product. If I am going to have surgery, I'd much rather use my own cells....at least I know where I've been! Lastly for the poster that mentioned the unfunded study and how the MSC's must be doing something because it's better than allograft...that's not saying much! Autograft is still the gold standard in most folks eyes and there are only 2 products on the market that have shown equivalence to autograft in prospective, peer-reviewed, Level 1, published clinical trials and I can assure you Osteocel and Trinity are not the 2.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
NuVasive
>
Osteocell Plus vs. Trinity Evolution
>
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Medical Equipment/Device Sales
>
NuVasive
>
Osteocell Plus vs. Trinity Evolution
>