Subpoenas From the U.S. Attorney TO ISTA

Discussion in 'Ista Pharma' started by Anonymous, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:28 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Calm down people!!!! The burden of proof is on the govt, There may not be a fine your jobs ar all okay!!!! Stop!!!!
     

  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    I have no problem calling you but first, who are you? Govt or work for Ista. I understand both could have significant $ involved.
     
  3. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    i just googled this number. it is a government number.
     
  4. OCI

    OCI Guest

    OCI stands for Office of Criminal Investigations. It's the criminal investigative arm of the FDA.
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Civil too.If there is fine, the whistleblower get 20% of the fine, but if you have good evidence you can be whistlblower too. Do think arep started this or DM?
     
  6. OCI

    OCI Guest

    Nope. We don't do civil.
     
  7. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    YESBUT THEGOVT DOES!!!!!
     
  8. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    So if I call you and share my information, you dont do civil, do I still get paid?
     
  9. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    You dont get part of criminal you get some the civil. Call an attorney from TAF.
     
  10. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Do you still think Ista going to be fined?
     
  11. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    No the govt dismissed the case!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  12. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    link?
     
  13. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Check out the 10 k form released today. Not dismissed


    In April 2008, we received subpoenas from the office of the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of New York requesting information regarding the marketing activities related to XIBROM. We are cooperating with the government’s investigation. From April 2008 through December*31, 2011, we have incurred approximately $5.2 million, including $1.3 million incurred in 2011, in legal fees associated with this criminal investigation and expect to incur significant expenses in the future. In October 2011, we, and certain of our officers and current and former employees received correspondence from the government identifying them as targets. Tolling agreements have been executed to allow cooperation and discussions regarding resolution. If the government chooses to engage in civil litigation or initiate a criminal prosecution against us, our officers or our current or former employees, as a result of its review of the requested documents and other evidence, we may have to incur significant amounts to defend such actions or pay or incur substantial fines or penalties, on behalf of ourselves, our officers or our current or former employees, any of which could significantly deplete our cash resources. The case is ongoing and the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and/or the amount/range of loss or additional expenses, cannot be reasonably estimated.
     
  14. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    THIS THE ORGINIAL POST. THIS IS NOT NEW DUMB ASS.
     
  15. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Not the same this is a new 10K with different numbers etc.
    http://www.istavision.com/sec-filings.html

    It's the one that says 2/27/12 10K, the one that is an update and is different then the original one posted...which was an older 10K
     
  16. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    I think it was recent since it mentions Dec. 2011.
     
  17. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    past and current employees as 'targets' ? Oops. I guess selling off-label doesn't get you anything in the end. I will always wonder why people would do that especially for a company like this. They treat us like shit and demand that we break the law to stay. Pretty amazing. I'm looking. Can't stay here any longer.
     
  18. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Thank God. Good bye!
     
  19. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    Yep... Still going to be dismissed, the govt ONLY takes very few of these type cases, and this NOT going to be intervened on!!!
     
  20. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    I agree if they were going to fine Ista, the govt would have already sanctioned them by now.