VERP #2??

Discussion in 'Pfizer' started by anonymous, Nov 18, 2018 at 6:09 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    On the conference call with Fidelity they mentioned that if they didn't get the number they were looking for with respect to VERP then they might offer a subsequent, better offer to 55 plus 10 employees. Anybody got any good inside info. on that??
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    The initial offer was terrible. A reduced package, say two weeks per year and continued benefits would have attracted many more. As it was it was better to gamble on the lay-off and the enhanced package. Plenty of rtirement qualified people would have taken an enhanced option.
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I don’t know anyone who took it
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    It did not help legacy reps much at all. I think it was aimed at management only.
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    why would it help managers and not reps equally?
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    People keep saying it was senior level employees. Well it would suck for them too. Why would anyone opt for this crappy package. It’s a disgrace how Pfizer treats its most loyal, senior employees!!
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    It’s the senior employee’s who make this shit come to fruition. Pfizer is just a good old boy network who couldn’t give 2 shits about any colleague who came from another company.
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Precisely! Everyone should know that it's "survival of the fittest" culture.
     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Few took VERP and NONE were offered a "marketing" extension.
     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    If few took it then what was the damn point of the offering? I have been in Pharma a VERY long time and I have NEVER heard of an early retirement package without a severance!! Rediculous.
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    It gave them all of their stock options they get in droves now and not need to wait years for them to vest. We reps rarely get these Long Term Investments. You have to be in the top 10%.
    The money for them is quite substantial to have today, not 5 years from now.
     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Very interesting
     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I did gladly! It has to do with your financial situation. My spouse very diligently managed our investments for the last 35 years and now we are sitting on 2mill+ for my pensions ( not counting 401k)
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    BS. You would have already hit the Rule of 90. The VERP is not applicable to you and the only benefit would be your LTI vesting now. That and the 3 yrs of medical health insurance.

    You should have already retired. It's not an early retirement for you.
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Didn’t matter if you had hit the rule of 90. Everyone who was 55 plus 10 got the offer. You are right though that for him the only benefit was the three year benefit extension and immediate vesting. If he was 60 plus and wanted coverage to get to Medicare then it was a good move.