What happened to the once great Merck

Discussion in 'Merck' started by anonymous, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:03 PM.

Tags: Add Tags
  1. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I heard the new Volvo among others.
     

  2. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    The car is all that’s left for us.
     
  3. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Getting back to the topic:

    Everything changed when they stopped having someone in the medical/sciences in charge of the company

    When they went from Roy Vagelos A physician to Ray Gilmartin An MBA

    They went from being a true innovator and leader in science and medical research to just another giant corporation only interested in stuffing the pockets of their senior management.

    The bean counters took over and rather look at ways to innovate they started mandating all the BS that the consultants could milk out of them.

    It became more important to have your desk items taped off and labeled according to 5S than to actually conduct research and look for new medicines! People were promoted more on how well they ass-kissed instead of actual R&D. It was more important not to hurt someones feelings (remember the micro-inequities training) than to tell them what they are doing is a pile of crap.

    Meanwhile the sycophants at the top agreed that we don't need to actually conduct research we can "purchase innovation"

    Then we had the ultimate used car salesman (Fred Hassan) sell Merak the Edsel of companies SGP. where they were promised their pipeline was rich with new products (turns out nearly all of them were turds) Along with the stupid thought that Remicade would be its new blockbuster.

    That is the sorry state of where Merck ended up today!
     
  4. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Well-said! Any way the BD is interested in turning this ship around? Find a qualified MD, scientist, etc. as CEO to get us back on course. Other companies have found effective leaders with the above qualifications. Time to Make Merck Great Again...
     
  5. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    About that Schering pipeline, it seems the only big moneymaker Merck has -- Keytruda -- came from Schering-Plough via Organon.
     
  6. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Brought in too many managers from Lilly, Pfizer and Amgen and now we're replicating their shitty company performance. Roger is OK but the rest are ladder climbing sycophants who follow trends and General Electric playbook. Look at the lack of new drugs from R&D or the performance evaluation system disasters. Smart, independent staff leave or are moved off to the side and ignored.
     
  7. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Too true!!
     
  8. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

     
  9. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

     
  10. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    What Happened to Merck you ask?

    The simplest answer is that a company whose core business is medicines CANNOT be run by individuals who don't enough human anatomy to know their own anuses from a hole in the ground.

    The golden age of Merck that everyone seems to miss now was driven by MDs. They were individuals, and Medical Doctor, who were extremely knowledgeable and qualified to understand what diseases could be tackled successfully when they were in control.

    A perfect example was Dr. Hilleman who was responsible for creating over 40 vaccines. Merck research Laboratories were the envy of the world when he ruled the place.

    What you see happening to Merck today is because the company was taken over by hucksters, marketers and lawyers who know absolutely nothing about inventing needed medicines or where to go to hire the talent that will make those medicines for you.

    It really is that simple.

    Merck will begin its slow ascent again when it is given back to the Doctors.
     
  11. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You forgot to mention that stick insect head of research IT who had no science credentials.

     
  12. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    ...and some originally started at Merck too

    Most people used to be focussed on the science and discovering new medicines and disease. Then, the culture changed because management hired and promoted a new type of leader in many departments. Self-absorbed ladder climbers who are great overstating their past success, their ability to lead teams, and maximizing their visibility to anyone who ranks above them. They only see and reward a small number of people in their organization. But underneath every action, "What's in it for me?" This mindset spreads like a disease and makes an organization ill.


     
  13. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Add to the above, GREED and Incompetencd , which permeates all of Pharma.
     
  14. anonymous

    anonymous Guest


    I take a different view, Merck became stagnant, did not keep up with changing times and requirements...many of the people in this company are functioning on knowledge from the 80-90's, Merck wanted way to long to bring in fresh, new perspectives...
     
  15. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    You mean like the "fresh, new perspective" in 1993 of acquiring Medco when Hillary-care looked like it was going to pass? Merck faked out the rest of the industry who were forced to scramble afterwards and buy up pharmacy benefit companies, only to have Merck realize the mistake a decade later and spin Medco off again. This did nothing for patients but was all about profits. And somebody in the C-suite got a big bonus and promotion in 1993 for thinking up the fresh new idea. And somebody different got a big bonus and promotion in 2003 for undoing the mistake.
    No, what happened to Merck was its deviation from George Merck's watchword "We try never to forget that medicine is for the people. It is not for the profits. The profits follow, and if we have remembered that, they have never failed to appear." When Momma hired marketeers, bean-counters, and lawyers to run the company instead of medical professionals, it became all about the god-almighty profits and the patient (and corporate ethics) were forgotten.
     
  16. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Well said. Profits before people is what’s bringing Pharma down. Trump is starting his efforts to bring down druo prices. He’s sending a message that if we don’t do it ourselves, he’ll do it for us. Think Pharma is listening?
     
  17. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Oh they are listening why do you thing manpower is on the chopping block. You are the profit killer with most of you eliminated price levels can by adjusted and still retain profit levels!
     
  18. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    I have been highly vocal in support of downsizing the nonproductive masses of employees. Not needed not valued!
     
  19. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    That and start raising prices to foreign countries. We’ve been subsidizing them for too long. Time to pay their fair share. Trump knows that we’ve allowed ourselves to be screwed for years selling our products at a fraction of their price in the US to foreign countries.
     
  20. anonymous

    anonymous Guest

    Yes, the biggest fraud on the planet is the USA subsidizing all other countries by inventing, studying, and then selling these products at a fraction of the cost. These foreign countries want these miraculous drugs, they need to pay their fair share.