Menu
Home
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
job listings
catering
whistleblower info
legal help
advertise on CP
submit press release
Menu
Log in
Sign up
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
More...
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Laboratory Personnel/Scientists
>
Bayer Lab Personnel
>
Why does quality control labwork suck?
>
Reply to Thread
Name:
Verification:
Answer the above question:
(
CustomImgCaptcha
By
Surrey Forum
)
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 5459556"]QC is the bottom of the barrel for science workers. You work in QC for a year or two and then either go to grad school for a Masters, PhD, or MBA. Anyone that works in a QC lab after 30 years old is losing. Sure, there are QC jobs everywhere. But most of them are contract and pay $15 an hour with no benefits. The hours are long, the work is mind-numbing, and the chemicals are dangerous. Let's not forget the fact that you have to deal with all kinds of nonsense and contradictory rules regarding documentation. If you get failing results on a test, management looks at you like you have three heads. It is always the technician's fault unless management can see some other huge error. Then it is a systematic error. Training for a lab tech will consist of someone already working 12 hours a day showing you a book of 100 SOPs to read and spending 30 minutes a day of showing you actual lab work.</p><p><br /></p><p>In other words, welcome to the wonderful world of quality control![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 5459556"]QC is the bottom of the barrel for science workers. You work in QC for a year or two and then either go to grad school for a Masters, PhD, or MBA. Anyone that works in a QC lab after 30 years old is losing. Sure, there are QC jobs everywhere. But most of them are contract and pay $15 an hour with no benefits. The hours are long, the work is mind-numbing, and the chemicals are dangerous. Let's not forget the fact that you have to deal with all kinds of nonsense and contradictory rules regarding documentation. If you get failing results on a test, management looks at you like you have three heads. It is always the technician's fault unless management can see some other huge error. Then it is a systematic error. Training for a lab tech will consist of someone already working 12 hours a day showing you a book of 100 SOPs to read and spending 30 minutes a day of showing you actual lab work. In other words, welcome to the wonderful world of quality control![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Laboratory Personnel/Scientists
>
Bayer Lab Personnel
>
Why does quality control labwork suck?
>
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Laboratory Personnel/Scientists
>
Bayer Lab Personnel
>
Why does quality control labwork suck?
>