Recent Posts

anonymous said:

years exp? big Pharma background? Salary expectations?

Click to expand...

Excuse me? I already interviewed and got an offer. I don’t need to interview with you as well.

anonymous said:

No complaints here. Nothing wrong with women in leadership as long as they’re easy on the eyes. Now back to you ya attention Starved ass hat. Your mama failed you. So best advice you’ll get on here is strap ‘‘em on and earn your pay check. You are a nuisance to society.

Click to expand...

Nothing wrong with women in leadership as long as they’re easy on the eyes.’
Did you copy/paste that from a 1950s HR manual, or does your misogyny write its own material?

Oh sweetie,
A pattern of only certain people in leadership is the same strategy your granddaddy swore built America.

So why do you take issue with a pattern of women in leadership at Gilead?

Bootstraps on, babe.

Isn’t that what you & your granddaddy always said? If women at Gilead are outperforming you, then Work Harder. And Smile. Put a smile on your face. People like it when you smile; you look more approachable.

You’re very emotional (you know- the term men put on women to keep us in our place). You called me attention starved, while you’re the one online throwing digital tantrums.

anonymous said:

How are the LA reps at the top after tanking Q1 and being all at the bottom? The rankings are clearly cherry-picked. This company doesn’t reward performance—it rewards favorites. Nothing about this is fair.

Click to expand...

Fires hit 1 territory not all of them. We’ve all had crap hit our cities and didn’t get a magic pass.


First the sketchy quotas, now this shady leaderboard? Whole system is cooked.

How are the LA reps at the top after tanking Q1 and being all at the bottom? The rankings are clearly cherry-picked. This company doesn’t reward performance—it rewards favorites. Nothing about this is fair.

anonymous said:

False

Click to expand...

For real?