Menu
Home
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
job listings
catering
whistleblower info
legal help
advertise on CP
submit press release
Menu
Log in
Sign up
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
More...
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Pharma/Biotech Companies
>
Upsher Smith Labs
>
Slo-Niacin vs Niaspan
>
Reply to Thread
Name:
Verification:
Answer the above question:
(
CustomImgCaptcha
By
Surrey Forum
)
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 2643783"]Typical dumbass KOS rep. You need to go back and read the HATS trial! Patients were only switched to IR niacin (NIACOR - USL product) if a specific patient didn't reach a certain threshhold. It was a small % of patients. Also, dumbass KOS rep, Slo-Niacin was the first extended-release niacin on the market and its release formula was virtually copied by KOS to create Niaspan. You pussies then went around claiming to be the niacin used in the HATS trial. I know because I had a lot of pissed off cardiologists when I showed them the Slo-Niacin name of the first page of the study. Kudos to KOS corporate for making it RX. But don't tell people that Niaspan is superior to Slo-Niacin. Liver issues only occur when physicians fail to warn patients about the dangers of taking more than 2000mg per day. If a patient took more than 2000mg of Niaspan, the same liver toxicities would take place. If you want to make claims that Niaspan is "safer" and that Slo-Niacin kills people, then put it in writing and have KOS endorse that statement. I'll be happy to bring it up with the FDA...stupid fuck![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 2643783"]Typical dumbass KOS rep. You need to go back and read the HATS trial! Patients were only switched to IR niacin (NIACOR - USL product) if a specific patient didn't reach a certain threshhold. It was a small % of patients. Also, dumbass KOS rep, Slo-Niacin was the first extended-release niacin on the market and its release formula was virtually copied by KOS to create Niaspan. You pussies then went around claiming to be the niacin used in the HATS trial. I know because I had a lot of pissed off cardiologists when I showed them the Slo-Niacin name of the first page of the study. Kudos to KOS corporate for making it RX. But don't tell people that Niaspan is superior to Slo-Niacin. Liver issues only occur when physicians fail to warn patients about the dangers of taking more than 2000mg per day. If a patient took more than 2000mg of Niaspan, the same liver toxicities would take place. If you want to make claims that Niaspan is "safer" and that Slo-Niacin kills people, then put it in writing and have KOS endorse that statement. I'll be happy to bring it up with the FDA...stupid fuck![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Pharma/Biotech Companies
>
Upsher Smith Labs
>
Slo-Niacin vs Niaspan
>
Cafepharma Message Boards | Pharma Sales, Device Sales, Lab Sales
Home
Forums
>
Pharma/Biotech Companies
>
Upsher Smith Labs
>
Slo-Niacin vs Niaspan
>