GSK ABANDONS DIVERSITY TARGETS

Quote

anonymous

Guest
LONDON, Feb 27 (Reuters) - British drugmaker GSK (GSK.L), will no longer set diversity targets, it said on Thursday, as it became the latest company to scale back or abandon such goals in response to the U.S. president's opposition to them.
Finally back to a level playing field! Never understood why promotions and raises were based on "Diversity Targets" instead of merit. Certain minorities were promoted from rep to FLL to Regional Vice President to Sector VP and so on for no reason other than to meet a quota.
 


anonymous said:
LONDON, Feb 27 (Reuters) - British drugmaker GSK (GSK.L), will no longer set diversity targets, it said on Thursday, as it became the latest company to scale back or abandon such goals in response to the U.S. president's opposition to them.
Finally back to a level playing field! Never understood why promotions and raises were based on "Diversity Targets" instead of merit. Certain minorities were promoted from rep to FLL to Regional Vice President to Sector VP and so on for no reason other than to meet a quota.
Click to expand...
Correct!
 




anonymous said:
LONDON, Feb 27 (Reuters) - British drugmaker GSK (GSK.L), will no longer set diversity targets, it said on Thursday, as it became the latest company to scale back or abandon such goals in response to the U.S. president's opposition to them.
Finally back to a level playing field! Never understood why promotions and raises were based on "Diversity Targets" instead of merit. Certain minorities were promoted from rep to FLL to Regional Vice President to Sector VP and so on for no reason other than to meet a quota.
Click to expand...
Cry more about it, bitch. You’ll still be mired in mediocrity.
 


anonymous said:
LONDON, Feb 27 (Reuters) - British drugmaker GSK (GSK.L), will no longer set diversity targets, it said on Thursday, as it became the latest company to scale back or abandon such goals in response to the U.S. president's opposition to them.
Finally back to a level playing field! Never understood why promotions and raises were based on "Diversity Targets" instead of merit. Certain minorities were promoted from rep to FLL to Regional Vice President to Sector VP and so on for no reason other than to meet a quota.
Click to expand...
Nice to see some sanity return. But it’s too little, too late. The damage is already done. It will take years, if ever, to recover from this woke stupidity. All the diversity hires are running the company now, and the mediocrity is evident for all to see. GSK is a laughing stock.
 


Ah yes, the brave decision to abandon diversity targets—what a bold, trailblazing move in the relentless quest to return to the status quo. After all, why bother with the exhausting effort of inclusion when you can just rebrand mediocrity as “meritocracy”? It’s almost poetic: years of pledges, panels, and performative progress flushed away in the name of “efficiency,” as if diversity were some quirky experiment we all politely endured. Who knew equality had an expiration date conveniently aligned with quarterly earnings?
 




God said:
You don't know what you don't know. A study is required.
Click to expand...
I want to include religious beliefs in my secondary analysis. Are people with certain religious beliefs superior to others? Are people with certain religious beliefs being oppressed? Is there a mediocrity within the fabric of corporate America based strictly on religious beliefs?
 


anonymous said:
Ah yes, the brave decision to abandon diversity targets—what a bold, trailblazing move in the relentless quest to return to the status quo. After all, why bother with the exhausting effort of inclusion when you can just rebrand mediocrity as “meritocracy”? It’s almost poetic: years of pledges, panels, and performative progress flushed away in the name of “efficiency,” as if diversity were some quirky experiment we all politely endured. Who knew equality had an expiration date conveniently aligned with quarterly earnings?
Click to expand...
Blacks don’t pull their weight here
 





Write your reply...
Top Bottom
Back
Quote