RE: Last post- I agree entirely. We are still discussing two key players in the vet mkt. right now, but with two different focus points on what they are offering. If reference were all that Idexx did, things may be different. Regarding VCA- the idea that VCA should be a negative affiliation towards anything is pretty stale. Doctors are not forced at gunpoint to sell their practices to VCA, and neither are the lab owners that sell to Antech. It's easy to try and perpetuate the idea that everything VCA is derogatory. There are many respected internists, surgeons, etc. that work for these clinics and provide remarkable services to those clients and communities. If these practices are so insufficient, why do they stay open? I'm sure there are also some doctors and staff that have had negative experiences as well, but that is the case with anything. Lab owners that sell their businesses come in all shapes and sizes. Some of them have every intention of entering the market as competition only to sell and make money a short time later. I also know of many lab owners who try to hold on to their businesses (with outdated equipment, staff that are lacking in training, etc) without selling to Idexx or Antech. You can blame the owners for that- not the labs who compete to buy them. VCA and Antech are no more of an 800 pound gorilla with their hospitals and reference labs, than Idexx is with their (at times) deplorable in-house testing recommendations, software sales, and reference lab selling. Both companies also offer extraordinary things to veterinarians as well (in focusing on the positive) i.e. charities, sponsorship, education, etc. etc.