Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Your days are numbered as Euflexxa will surpass Synvisc with in the next year. We out performed you in a head to head study and have no reactions. There's a new sherrif in town.
You absolutely do not have better efficacy. You can't even get a 26 week indication. It's all in how you counsel the patient will determine what's considered a "side Effect". As for cost, well, you will drag down reimbursement in your JCode with our other competitors, and eventually cause what the offices get back to drop in future quarters. Go learn how to work with the whole office, not just the Dr., Rent-A-Rep.
looks like stryker owns euflexxa now so genzyme you will need to worry
I sell neither synvisc or Euflexxa but I do know Euflexxa failed to show superiority over placebo. Additionally, Euflexxa has a warning on it's label for an "immune response". This warning has to do with the product's drawing HA from Streptocaucus Equi. For those who do not know. The strain of Strep is the carrier of an equine disease that has been shown to be transferable to humans and responsable for killing entire villages in south america. If that sounds scary, well it is. So, a product with latex warnings still on their insert as of 12-07, warnings of an "immune response", failed studies vs placebo. Hmmmmmm.
Euflexxa may have good reps, but to deny the DANGER in using the product thats anything but professional.
what kind of HA is in seprafilm...........is it made from chickens? Why is there no contraindication on the package insert. Maybe because it is NOT. Just a thought Be careful throwing around those big words before you actually know what it means.
I Are you that stupid that I have to spell it out to you. Your company makes bioHA (I bet you did not know that did you?)What does seprafilm have to do with anything??? There are warnings on the label very unique to EUFLEXXA only! Wait until the purity data comes out!