Insider Trading - SEC

Quote





Sounds like a conspiracy theorist is spouting off on this board in more than a few of these Neuroscience boards. Dude, just hang tight, the mid-term elections will be here soon enough and your boy Bernie Sanders will be ready for your support.
 


anonymous said:
Sounds like a conspiracy theorist is spouting off on this board in more than a few of these Neuroscience boards. Dude, just hang tight, the mid-term elections will be here soon enough and your boy Bernie Sanders will be ready for your support.
Click to expand...

Point proven Brendan, the “dude” gave your ignorant ass away. Both women that reported it to the government received call backs so fast that you tried to change your story on stage the next day. Done
 
















anonymous said:
From the article on insider selling:

The recent sale by Eliyahu Kalif is part of a broader trend observed over the past year, where there have been no insider buys and 15 insider sells within the company.

Looks like the big boys are taken profits while they can. Total vote of NO CONFIDENCE when you see no insider buying.
Click to expand...

Lol! Yahoo news
 


anonymous said:
From the article on insider selling:

The recent sale by Eliyahu Kalif is part of a broader trend observed over the past year, where there have been no insider buys and 15 insider sells within the company.

Looks like the big boys are taken profits while they can. Total vote of NO CONFIDENCE when you see no insider buying.
Click to expand...

Ok, we have whats called a "Manipulator" here trying to scare people without understanding how things work. So, lets breakdown his fear mongering.

The sale of 77,550 shares by Kalif, EXVP & CFO is a non-event. It was in response to 73,707 restricted shares awarded to him the day before. Sales of this nature are a non-event. It's a bonus which execs generally immediately convert to cash. Not unusual.

Your post is from a yahoo news copy article from GuruFocus who reported this sale and other sales designed to portray a negative view of the sale and the company. Notice how they did not report the restricted shares awarded to Kalif the day before? Just go to SEC Form 4 on Edgar to see info.

Lastly, the GuruFocus report mentions repeated sales by other executives, but mentions nothing about the corresponding shares awarded to them. And, most important, most executives take the money from the sale of their shares and use it to diversify into other investments rather than concentrate holdings in Teva or one particular company. This is a term mostly referred to as "Investing".

Whoever started this whole topic of conversation is awesome. It made me laugh so hard how much you tried to scare people with little information and inaccurate assumptions. You are not an investor and do not understand the business world.
 


anonymous said:
From the article on insider selling:

The recent sale by Eliyahu Kalif is part of a broader trend observed over the past year, where there have been no insider buys and 15 insider sells within the company.

Looks like the big boys are taken profits while they can. Total vote of NO CONFIDENCE when you see no insider buying.
Click to expand...

You are aware those shares were issued the day before, right? This us common practice for execs. It's how they get Paid their bonuses. Look around, all companies are doing this right not because most execs down to the sales reps are getting bonuses. Seriously,understand what you are talking about before posting such nonsense
 


anonymous said:
You are aware those shares were issued the day before, right? This is common practice for execs. It's how they get Paid their bonuses. Look around, all companies are doing this right not because most execs down to the sales reps are getting bonuses. Seriously,understand what you are talking about before posting such nonsense
Click to expand...
Absolutely this is common practice, but it is not a good look when the company is in its current state. Surely better to for senior execs to be holding the shares to show some confidence in the company and the share price trajectory rather than exiting them so quickly. It’s not as though they aren’t paid reasonable salaries to cover their daily living expenses.
 


anonymous said:
Absolutely this is common practice, but it is not a good look when the company is in its current state. Surely better to for senior execs to be holding the shares to show some confidence in the company and the share price trajectory rather than exiting them so quickly. It’s not as though they aren’t paid reasonable salaries to cover their daily living expenses.
Click to expand...

teva executives are thieves
 


anonymous said:
Absolutely this is common practice, but it is not a good look when the company is in its current state. Surely better to for senior execs to be holding the shares to show some confidence in the company and the share price trajectory rather than exiting them so quickly. It’s not as though they aren’t paid reasonable salaries to cover their daily living expenses.
Click to expand...

Give me a break. Lol! When were you fired from teva?
 



Write your reply...
Top Bottom
Back
Quote