Lenco

Quote



Ask the Enzo reps who were let go last week, did they sign a non-compete ?

where are they going to go with a non-compete and $1-2mm book that is willing to deal with labcorp suing them. ?
 




Enzo reps will find a job in the lab business without worrying about a NC. BIO will grab them 1-2-3.

The sale will be done by another rep and the credit will be paid to the rep who left LC. This isn’t rocket science. It’s the accounts they can’t touch. But BIO and other labs will work that out. So will Sunrise. Scare tactics are from the 90’s and so are sales non-competes with regard to going to work with the competitor.
 
















Facts or fiction said:
Enzo reps will find a job in the lab business without worrying about a NC. BIO will grab them 1-2-3.

The sale will be done by another rep and the credit will be paid to the rep who left LC. This isn’t rocket science. It’s the accounts they can’t touch. But BIO and other labs will work that out. So will Sunrise. Scare tactics are from the 90’s and so are sales non-competes with regard to going to work with the competitor.
Click to expand...

Ask SP how it worked out when leaving LC. Even if the rep wins, LC will sue. LC and rep will settle, rep won't be able to touch the LC accounts and if they do, LC will sue the rep and new lab. LC does this all the time. Remember, LC and Q huge legal budgets. They will tie you up in court long enough to lock in the accounts and all you are left with is a large legal bill. If the rep was given a sign on bonus, signed a new NC of their own free will or the rep quit, the NC will hold. If LC fired the rep that is a different story. Be very careful what the fools on this website tell you!
 


anonymous said:
Ask SP how it worked out when leaving LC. Even if the rep wins, LC will sue. LC and rep will settle, rep won't be able to touch the LC accounts and if they do, LC will sue the rep and new lab. LC does this all the time. Remember, LC and Q huge legal budgets. They will tie you up in court long enough to lock in the accounts and all you are left with is a large legal bill. If the rep was given a sign on bonus, signed a new NC of their own free will or the rep quit, the NC will hold. If LC fired the rep that is a different story. Be very careful what the fools on this website tell you!
Click to expand...

Most non competes are not enforceable, though there is some state-to-state variation.

Quest never had the stomach to fight these on a rep level and lost some cases with bigger fish.
 


anonymous said:
Ask SP how it worked out when leaving LC. Even if the rep wins, LC will sue. LC and rep will settle, rep won't be able to touch the LC accounts and if they do, LC will sue the rep and new lab. LC does this all the time. Remember, LC and Q huge legal budgets. They will tie you up in court long enough to lock in the accounts and all you are left with is a large legal bill. If the rep was given a sign on bonus, signed a new NC of their own free will or the rep quit, the NC will hold. If LC fired the rep that is a different story. Be very careful what the fools on this website tell you!
Click to expand...


That won’t work in NY. Unless the account is valued at over 1 million. NJ? Different story. NY reps can whizz all over a NC.

Hope this helps.
 


Facts and fiction said:
That won’t work in NY. Unless the account is valued at over 1 million. NJ? Different story. NY reps can whizz all over a NC.

Hope this helps.
Click to expand...

You are seriously misinformed. It depends on what compensation was. If there was a signing bonus or bonuses during the employment in NY then the NC can hold. If the rep quits, they better have a valid reason or the NC holds. All NC are binding contracts. If a lab sues the rep, they must get legal representations and it can take 6mos or more to break the NC. Most of the time Big labs don't care about the NC because 90% of the reps suck! It is the good reps that will have problems. Before you come on here spouting your BS, learn the law and the space! Do not argue with a member of the bar who has tried over 100 NC cases in NY HOPE THIS HELPS!
 


the real ticket here is a non-solicit agreement.

This is like any other business decision...is there enough ROI to merit legal action. Each case/circumstance is different .
 


anonymous said:
You are seriously misinformed. It depends on what compensation was. If there was a signing bonus or bonuses during the employment in NY then the NC can hold. If the rep quits, they better have a valid reason or the NC holds. All NC are binding contracts. If a lab sues the rep, they must get legal representations and it can take 6mos or more to break the NC. Most of the time Big labs don't care about the NC because 90% of the reps suck! It is the good reps that will have problems. Before you come on here spouting your BS, learn the law and the space! Do not argue with a member of the bar who has tried over 100 NC cases in NY HOPE THIS HELPS!
Click to expand...

“It depends” <—— lmfao

In NY, it’s all about the dollars, membrane. Lemme make this easier for you to comprehend. As long as the individual account isn’t valued over 1 million, NC aren’t worth used toilet water. If you’re a member of the bar, I think you’re not too good. Probably better at a bar as a bartender than giving advice on NC in NY.

Hope this helps.
 


anonymous said:
the real ticket here is a non-solicit agreement.

This is like any other business decision...is there enough ROI to merit legal action. Each case/circumstance is different .
Click to expand...

Exactly. The Sheil reps did the same thing. They left Quest, took their book of business and were hired by other labs. Quest isn’t going to fight over 100k per year accounts. It will cost them more in attorneys fees. Reps holding big bags are the ones who will be chased down. And even then, in NY that’s a long, fruitless chase. The account will work with the person they feel more confident in. Quest would lose that fight 99 times out of 100.
 







Write your reply...
Top Bottom
Back
Quote