PATCH?!

Quote





so; don't understand why we're partnering with a company whose patch doesn't stay on the patients for more than a few days and whose tracings look like it's attached to an hfdf tower. seriously?
 
















lol - you are such worthless, mindless complete wastes of time. i love when people don't have a clue what is actually going on, feel sorry for themselves, post anonymously, and validate their complete uselessness. go sell something. if you don't like what you're selling, go to another company. if you can't do that, you're obviously better at complaining than you are selling and should pursue a different career. what is so funny is it's your decision. stop whining like a little frickin' moron and go do something productive. if you want something different, change it. don't whine to us about how everyone else is causing you such problems in your life. what a frickin' joke. how pathetic is that?? really!?
 






Another whistleblower claim which an Illinois court just refused to dismiss and it will move forward. How'd you miss this Lee?? Maybe you should fire yourself now. Allegedly Changing names on patient forms of employee who interpreted the test. If read in India, name was changed to a US employee before being submitted to Government for payment. Not so sure that's allowed. This will be fun to watch.
 




You are correct. To be factual:
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said the whistle-blower's allegations, which included four specific claims submitted to Medicare that involved Indian technicians whose names were switched with U.S.-based technicians before submission to a referring physician, plausibly alleged that LifeWatch submitted false claims to the government. The court also pointed to forms LifeWatch allegedly submitted with each claim that certified compliance with federal health-care regulations as sufficient to establish liability under an express certification theory of liability.

The case is United States ex rel. Cieszynski v. LifeWatch Servs., Inc., 2015 BL 342749, N.D. Ill., No. 1:13-cv-04052, 10/19/15.
 


With a CIA in place, LW won't get another chance. Finally - Lee will be uncovered as the scumbag that he is. Falsifying the names: I wonder who's decision this was? Leverenz? My guess is that Lee turned a blind eye for years on this and they should both be gone.
 


anonymous said:
You are correct. To be factual:
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said the whistle-blower's allegations, which included four specific claims submitted to Medicare that involved Indian technicians whose names were switched with U.S.-based technicians before submission to a referring physician, plausibly alleged that LifeWatch submitted false claims to the government. The court also pointed to forms LifeWatch allegedly submitted with each claim that certified compliance with federal health-care regulations as sufficient to establish liability under an express certification theory of liability.

The case is United States ex rel. Cieszynski v. LifeWatch Servs., Inc., 2015 BL 342749, N.D. Ill., No. 1:13-cv-04052, 10/19/15.
Click to expand...
By Eric Topor

A federal district court in Illinois denied cardiac monitoring company LifeWatch Services Inc.'s motion to dismiss a whistle-blower's lawsuit accusing the company of using uncertified technicians in India to perform monitoring services in violation of federal health-care regulations.

False Claims Act whistle-blower Matthew Cieszynski, a technician with LifeWatch, alleged that his employer was using technicians in India to perform cardiac monitoring services to patients in the United States, and then switching the technician's name with a LifeWatch certified technician in the U.S. before submitting the claims for payment to Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE and the Veterans Administration Health Care. Cieszynski said LifeWatch knew that federal health-care program regulations require patients located in the U.S. to be treated by persons also located in the U.S., and that it falsely certified that it was in compliance with regulations with every claim submission.

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said the whistle-blower's allegations, which included four specific claims submitted to Medicare that involved Indian technicians whose names were switched with U.S.-based technicians before submission to a referring physician, plausibly alleged that LifeWatch submitted false claims to the government. The court also pointed to forms LifeWatch allegedly submitted with each claim that certified compliance with federal health-care regulations as sufficient to establish liability under an express certification theory of liability.

The case is United States ex rel. Cieszynski v. LifeWatch Servs., Inc., 2015 BL 342749, N.D. Ill., No. 1:13-cv-04052, 10/19/15.
 







Write your reply...
Top Bottom
Back
Quote