The NBRX has become the standard metric for IC throughout the industry. I don’t agree with it, but there are bigger problems at this company we should be worried about.
The NBRX has become the standard metric for IC throughout the industry. I don’t agree with it, but there are bigger problems at this company we should be worried about.
The NBRX has become the standard metric for IC throughout the industry. I don’t agree with it, but there are bigger problems at this company we should be worried about.
Yep. Smart companies approach things with a long term view in consideration. Like building relationships with HCPs. Understanding market dynamics and admitting to shitty coverage and access. Leadership here likes stories of rainbows and butterflies to BS the board. Time ran out for one brand. Now all eyes are on AZS.
The NBRX has become the standard metric for IC throughout the industry. I don’t agree with it, but there are bigger problems at this company we should be worried about.
Weighted targets, 100% on NBRx. Given this information at end of 1st month in Q1. Layoffs. Losing Adlarity. Culture quickly changing. Desperation is starting to show. Are investors tidying things up for the books in order to sell?
Weighted targets, 100% on NBRx. Given this information at end of 1st month in Q1. Layoffs. Losing Adlarity. Culture quickly changing. Desperation is starting to show. Are investors tidying things up for the books in order to sell?