Ok everyone.......let's chime in on a simpler question. If you were a surgeon and you absolutely, positively had to choose an implant that you were sure would integrate would it be a 3i? Would it be a Certain? Would it be an NT, Would it be an enhanced NT? Would it be a Prevail? Would it be a Straight Prevail? Would it be a Nanotite? Would it be an Osseotite2? Would it be a T3? Hahaha this is too much fun. If your connection was soooooo good, why have you changed designs half a dozen times in the last 6 or 7 years. You HAVE ZERO credibility scientifically anymore. Listen Bro, I have NEVER lost a surgeon due to implant failures? How many have you lost? I got guys that do immediates, single stage almost exclusively. I love you guys, Primary Stability blah, blah, blah (it is touchy, feely nonsense). My implants are osseointegrated after 8 weeks, period. Aesthetically, you can't touch our johnson. Astra has not changed hardly a thing about its implant in 25 years, so if you are trying to claim we have no long term data, you are wrong, dead wrong. Seal me, seal you!!
You didn't answer the question... But's that was to be expected because that's how Astra Sales peeps play the game. Rather than rebutt using the LATEST independent literatures or science, you cry out like the kid on the playground threatening to take his ball with him.
Seriously, put down the smoking device and ask yourself to look into the mirror.
I will agree, maybe we have too much in our bag to offer. However, those options helps me sell to those who have different opinions of what an ideal implant are to them. For instance, there are still those that prefer a polished collar (god knows why), I got that.
There are those that prefer platform switched built in (I got that).
There are those that prefer to go straight to cad-cam without having to remove a healing abutment (ahem, you guessed it).
Also, there are those who prefer higher primary stability for immediates, especially for full arch (and yes, you guessed it, I got that)
My opinion, I evaluate my market, and then I know what to offer. It's simple. I don't have to mention every single implant we have to a prospective surgeon, just the ones I know that he would like to learn more of.
For instance, there are those Straumman and Astra users that prefer a rougher surface implant. T3 answers the call, plus with better a better connection that has been proven in Today's studies, not 7 years ago. Yeah, I got that too now.
Quick story, I had a Straumann rep who didn't do his homework trying to sell a loyal specialist on their surface, and tried to convince them that 3i is too smooth and thus leads to failure in poor quality bone conditions. According to the specialist, his partner tossed him a T3 sitting on his desk. The message was; and I'm para-phrasing here; try learning what's new in the industry, especially your competition which I am loyal to, before bashing.