Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
A mouth-hold? You're quite the wordsmith. Do you have a lot of experience with Dr. Hidden and his mouth-hold technique?
*Nissen* damn iPad autocorrect.
A mouth-hold? You're quite the wordsmith. Do you have a lot of experience with Dr. Hidden and his mouth-hold technique?
*Nissen* damn iPad autocorrect.
*Nissen* damn iPad autocorrect.
kinda ruins your lame pun when you can't proof-read, eh?
Have you guys at JNJ had your first fatal gut-bleed on your new drug zarelto yet?
Nope, the FDA and NICE are looking at your 50 deaths and new kidney function test though. Pradaxa has been such a blockbuster, 6 months in new prescriptions started trailing off. Nice work BI, you can scream all you want, for your bonus of course not for the good of medicine or patients, and the fact that your drug is crap was uncovered less than a year in shows how weak you bitches really are.
Xarelto and Pradaxa are both dosed based on kidney function. Will doctors just guess when prescribing Xarelto? We picked the easy fruit, those left don't want a 40 to 50 dollar Medicare copay. Best of luck getting them to go 3rd and 4th tier.
260 deaths/over 400,000 treated equals <0.06% deaths
The average annual mortality rate in patients with atrial fibrillation is 3-5% (depending on source).
260 deaths/over 400,000 treated equals <0.06% deaths
The average annual mortality rate in patients with atrial fibrillation is 3-5% (depending on source).
The 260 deaths were related to BLEEDS and complications (AEs) not MIs or stroke or death clouds outcomes.Your data is wrong....the article said 260 deaths on Pradaxa worldwide, which is more in line with 1 million RX's and NOT 400K.
The drug is an "anti-coagulant" used to treat sick people who already have a "death-cloud' hanging over their heads. An "Anticoagulant" makes this cloud smaller, but never gets rid of it. Thus, you will ALWAYS have death associated while taking these drugs regardless of the benefits these drugs give. No death is wanted but some deaths are expected on these types of drugs.
If anybody should understand about minimizing things it should be you guys at JNJ and Bayer.
Comming at ya AFib with a black box for death once you stop taking the drug - better hope patients on xzarelto don't need a tooth extraction, colonoscopy, or procedure, because if they stop taking it they will regret it. At least you can have dialysis to clear it out of your system - oh wait you CAN'T!
Tooth extraction= planned. Colonoscopy=planned. ACS event= NEVER planned. Moron! Take a nice look at the Atlas results. Xarelto has HUGE, game changing, guideline changing data my friend. Cardioprotective benefits on top of stroke reduction.... Pradaxa FAILED this attempt idiot (as did apixaban) I would rather deal with a bleed than be wheeled out of the hospital to a funeral home. Mortality trumps everything pal. Game over!!!
Doesn't matter if they can't even stop taking the drug to get a catheter placed. Listen, the only way zarelto worked for ACS was in lowest of lowest dose but had huge, huge increase in bleeding. Cardiologists will say NOT worth the risk of loosing my license with a malpractice suit by prescribing triple therapy. Also, there's no way in the world the FDA will even consider getting your drug approved for ACS. The BARELY approved you for DVT (took 4 yrs because the FDA didn't like your data) and took a political override of FDA admin to get AFib. Do you honestly think the FDA even trusts Janssen or Bayer after your "per Protocol" horse-shit.
Game-over for you.
The Dax-man
.
.
.
Conference call on a Sunday - ATLAS....?
.
.
.