Next cut: Fleet Department

Quote

anonymous

Guest
This is the last year for company sponsored vehicles supporting field sales group. Next year, expect a reimbursement model where drivers receive $500 pre-tax per month, netting roughly $300 to purchase fuel and support whatever they prefer driving. You can't see docs anyway. Enjoy your Nissan Versa or your Hyundai Venue. Order takers.
 


anonymous said:
This is the last year for company sponsored vehicles supporting field sales group. Next year, expect a reimbursement model where drivers receive $500 pre-tax per month, netting roughly $300 to purchase fuel and support whatever they prefer driving. You can't see docs anyway. Enjoy your Nissan Versa or your Hyundai Venue. Order takers.
Click to expand...
Source?
 








anonymous said:
I’m curious Mister sales-shill hillbilly by what authority do you speak and what is your professional experience in fleet management?


None, zero, nada.
Click to expand...
Oh how little you pay attention to woke GSK. Every rep will be in EV’s very soon and you would be too, if you didn’t get fired for being inept.
 


It has long been rumored that GSK would switch to a monthly stipend for car allowances for representatives as a cost-saving measure. However, no major pharmaceutical company has adopted this approach; it has only been seen in contract, device, and diagnostic roles.
GSK already has a problem attracting decent talent, adopting such a policy would weaken our already weak talent pool.
 


anonymous said:
It has long been rumored that GSK would switch to a monthly stipend for car allowances for representatives as a cost-saving measure. However, no major pharmaceutical company has adopted this approach; it has only been seen in contract, device, and diagnostic roles.
GSK already has a problem attracting decent talent, adopting such a policy would weaken our already weak talent pool.
Click to expand...
Thanks for confirming our information.

So we’re going to a reimbursement Fleet in 2025 fourth-quarter, your message confirms our suspicion. The genesis of the information we have comes from an insider during the recent NETS conference.

Looks like you’re trying to perpetuate a cover-up of the inevitable.

Our advice is for you to take off your seatbelt drive down to Charlottesville and sit in one of the crash test vehicles and become the test dummy you really are.
 


anonymous said:
It has long been rumored that GSK would switch to a monthly stipend for car allowances for representatives as a cost-saving measure. However, no major pharmaceutical company has adopted this approach; it has only been seen in contract, device, and diagnostic roles.
GSK already has a problem attracting decent talent, adopting such a policy would weaken our already weak talent pool.
Click to expand...
Dude, our talent left years ago. Look around, what's left is angry, Fox watching plumpers who hate the world. Their only source of joy is "owning the libs"

We are the epitome of slightly below average. We have zero talent left. Most of us, well let's just say our wive's make more money than us.
 


anonymous said:
It has long been rumored that GSK would switch to a monthly stipend for car allowances for representatives as a cost-saving measure. However, no major pharmaceutical company has adopted this approach; it has only been seen in contract, device, and diagnostic roles.
GSK already has a problem attracting decent talent, adopting such a policy would weaken our already weak talent pool.
Click to expand...
Are you serioulsy saying you'd rather have a cheap fleet car instead of your own car of choice? The monthly stipend should be more than $500 but for a lot of people the company car is a turn off.
 




anonymous said:
Are you serioulsy saying you'd rather have a cheap fleet car instead of your own car of choice? The monthly stipend should be more than $500 but for a lot of people the company car is a turn off.
Click to expand...
You must have never had a job that required you to own your car with a car allowance. The average price of a vehicle is now over $48,000. Interest rates are on average 6.5% for new cars. More for used. So you want to take that huge car payment that your allowance won’t come close to covering, pay your own insurance, your own maintenance (tires, brakes, oil changes, etc) and beat your car into the ground so by the time it’s half paid off it has 80,000 miles and will only get more expensive to own? Just so you can own the brand of car you like. lol. Brilliant. Anyone with a brain will take a company car all day. GSK would save an incredible amount of money giving you that allowance.
 






anonymous said:
Are you serioulsy saying you'd rather have a cheap fleet car instead of your own car of choice? The monthly stipend should be more than $500 but for a lot of people the company car is a turn off.
Click to expand...
Pfizer offers representatives the option to either use a company car or receive a $1,000 monthly stipend toward their personal vehicle. This arrangement appears to be fair.
 


anonymous said:
Pfizer offers representatives the option to either use a company car or receive a $1,000 monthly stipend toward their personal vehicle. This arrangement appears to be fair.
Click to expand...
That’s why we are offering $500 to the sales-shills chuckwagon meals on wheelers drivers! Plus, we benchmarked the industry average at the Atlanta NETS CONFERENCE in 2024, $500, flat rate 100% reimbursement Fleet by 2026.
 


There is rarely ever a scenario where using your own car with a reimbursement in a sales role is a better option that having a company car. GSK knows that it will save them significant money to do so. Which means one thing. Reps will be getting an allowance in the near future.
 




anonymous said:
It has long been rumored that GSK would switch to a monthly stipend for car allowances for representatives as a cost-saving measure. However, no major pharmaceutical company has adopted this approach; it has only been seen in contract, device, and diagnostic roles.
GSK already has a problem attracting decent talent, adopting such a policy would weaken our already weak talent pool.
Click to expand...
Pfizer has. It is optional. There you go.
 





Write your reply...
Top Bottom
Back
Quote