Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Very informative discussion. Thanks for everyone's contribution. I am looking at a job with them.
Is it illegal to code for an ALIF when you have done an XLIF?
What do you think?
What is the XLIF code or direct lateral code then?
There isnt one, the only guidance that has been given is from NASS as to code as an ALIF or Anterior fusion.
So your logic is incorrect
I think the DOJ will figure it out. They are out to get all the spine companies for there unethical practices. An ALIF is completely different than an XLIF. There is no code for XLIF, that is why it is being classified as investigative. You can take Alex out of Danek, but you cannot take the Danek out of Alex.
XLIF is just a brand name. later approaches have been around for a long time. this is not a DOJ issue or a case of bad medicine. Q: are you accessing the anterior column with and ALIF? A: Yes. Q: Are you accessing the anterior column with and XLIF? A: Yes.
I cant think of any "approach" that is classified as investigational?? if i am wrong please let me know? XLIF is NOT a device like TDRs or Xstop. XLIF is the brand name given by a compay (nuvasive) who uses a retractor to place a PEEK cage.... is a MIS TLIF via a Metrx tube investigational.........................NO
so glad i bought a ton of stock last week. yesss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OK, so they got NASS (read: one or two surgeons receiving consulting dollars) to write a letter. Bully for them. And this got Aetna to reverse their policy. I used to work for Aetna and their medical directors do not hold a high bar of clinical superiority for therapies. Aetna's national enrollment- on the downward slide.
The true test is that if/when BCBS (100+ mil lives) reviews this and posts a negative position on the procedure, it'll be very tough for Nuvasive to overcome without new clinical data and/or a coding revision. You might want to take that $10 gain and cut bait.
Until now no surgeon has been denied coverage for XLIF